CVE-2026-58055
Description
A flaw in nghttp2's nghttpx proxy allows a remote attacker to perform HTTP request smuggling and cross-client response-queue poisoning. This occurs because the proxy ambiguously forwards HTTP/1.1 Upgrade requests that contain a Content-Length header to reusable keep-alive backend connections.
Statement
A flaw in nghttp2's nghttpx proxy allows remote HTTP request smuggling and cross-client response poisoning by forwarding malformed HTTP/1.1 Upgrade requests containing a Content-Length body. This is rated Moderate because successful exploitation requires high attack complexity on the backend server.
Mitigation
Configure your WAF or load balancer to drop incoming HTTP/1.1 requests that contain both Upgrade and Content-Length headers. This blocks the malformed traffic at the edge before it can reach the vulnerable proxy without impacting legitimate users.
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Info alert:Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authority (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications).
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base Score | 5.4 | N/A | 5.4 |
| Attack Vector | Network | N/A | Network |
| Attack Complexity | High | N/A | High |
| Privileges Required | None | N/A | None |
| User Interaction | None | N/A | None |
| Scope | Changed | N/A | Changed |
| Confidentiality | Low | N/A | Low |
| Integrity Impact | Low | N/A | Low |
| Availability Impact | None | N/A | None |
Vector
Red Hat: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
cve.org: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Understanding the Weakness (CWE)
Integrity,Non-Repudiation,Access Control
Technical Impact: Unexpected State; Hide Activities; Bypass Protection Mechanism
An attacker could create HTTP messages to exploit a number of weaknesses including 1) the message can trick the web server to associate a URL with another URL's webpage and caching the contents of the webpage (web cache poisoning attack), 2) the message can be structured to bypass the firewall protection mechanisms and gain unauthorized access to a web application, and 3) the message can invoke a script or a page that returns client credentials (similar to a Cross Site Scripting attack).
Frequently Asked Questions
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.
Want to get errata notifications? Sign up here.
