CVE-2026-44896

Description

A flaw was found in Mistune, a Python Markdown parser. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to inject malicious code into web pages, leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). The issue arises from the render_figure() function, which improperly handles figclass and figwidth options by directly embedding them into HTML attributes without escaping. This oversight can enable an attacker to execute arbitrary scripts in a user's browser, potentially compromising user sessions or disclosing sensitive information.

Statement

This Moderate-impact Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) flaw in the Mistune Markdown parser affects Red Hat products that process untrusted markdown content. The vulnerability allows attribute injection and XSS due to improper handling of figclass and figwidth options, bypassing HTML escaping. Successful exploitation requires user interaction with a specially crafted markdown file.

Mitigation

Upgrade mistune to version 3.2.1 or later in affected Red Hat products when updated builds become available.

Until updated images are available, avoid rendering untrusted Markdown content through mistune Figure directives, or ensure figclass and figwidth options are not sourced from untrusted input. Applications using HTMLRenderer(escape=True) remain vulnerable to this issue because figclass and figwidth bypass the inline renderer.

Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details

Info alert:Important note

CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authority (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications).

The following CVSS metrics and score provided are preliminary and subject to review.

CVSS v3 Score Breakdown

Red HatNVDcve.org
Base Score5.46.1N/A
Attack VectorNetworkNetworkN/A
Attack ComplexityLowLowN/A
Privileges RequiredNoneNoneN/A
User InteractionRequiredRequiredN/A
ScopeUnchangedChangedN/A
ConfidentialityLowLowN/A
Integrity ImpactLowLowN/A
Availability ImpactNoneNoneN/A

Vector

Red Hat: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

NVD: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Understanding the Weakness (CWE)

Access Control,Confidentiality

Technical Impact: Bypass Protection Mechanism; Read Application Data

The most common attack performed with cross-site scripting involves the disclosure of private information stored in user cookies, such as session information. Typically, a malicious user will craft a client-side script, which -- when parsed by a web browser -- performs some activity on behalf of the victim to an attacker-controlled system (such as sending all site cookies to a given E-mail address). This could be especially dangerous to the site if the victim has administrator privileges to manage that site. This script will be loaded and run by each user visiting the web site. Since the site requesting to run the script has access to the cookies in question, the malicious script does also.

Integrity,Confidentiality,Availability

Technical Impact: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands

In some circumstances it may be possible to run arbitrary code on a victim's computer when cross-site scripting is combined with other flaws, for example, "drive-by hacking."

Confidentiality,Integrity,Availability,Access Control

Technical Impact: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands; Bypass Protection Mechanism; Read Application Data

The consequence of an XSS attack is the same regardless of whether it is stored or reflected. The difference is in how the payload arrives at the server. XSS can cause a variety of problems for the end user that range in severity from an annoyance to complete account compromise. Some cross-site scripting vulnerabilities can be exploited to manipulate or steal cookies, create requests that can be mistaken for those of a valid user, compromise confidential information, or execute malicious code on the end user systems for a variety of nefarious purposes. Other damaging attacks include the disclosure of end user files, installation of Trojan horse programs, redirecting the user to some other page or site, running "Active X" controls (under Microsoft Internet Explorer) from sites that a user perceives as trustworthy, and modifying presentation of content.

Frequently Asked Questions

Want to get errata notifications? Sign up here.