CVE-2026-26960

Description

A flaw was found in node-tar. An attacker can craft a malicious archive that, when extracted with default options, creates a hardlink outside the intended extraction directory. This vulnerability allows the attacker to perform arbitrary file read and write operations as the user extracting the archive, bypassing existing path protections. This can lead to unauthorized access and modification of sensitive system files.

Statement

In Red Hat environments, this condition introduces a significant constraint, as exploitation requires user interaction and reliance on unsafe handling of externally supplied archives. The attack is not remotely exploitable in isolation and depends on a user or service processing attacker-controlled input.

Furthermore, the impact of the vulnerability is limited to the privileges of the extracting process. In typical Red Hat deployments, archive extraction is performed by non-privileged users or within confined environments such as containers or restricted service contexts, which limits the scope of potential damage.

Red Hat analysis also notes that this issue does not provide a direct mechanism for code execution or privilege escalation, but rather enables file system manipulation within the boundaries of the executing user’s permissions.

Given the requirement for user-assisted exploitation, the absence of a direct remote attack vector, and the confinement of impact to the privileges of the extracting process, Red Hat considers the practical risk to be lower than the generalized NVD assessment. As a result, this vulnerability is classified as Moderate severity.

Mitigation

Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.

Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details

Info alert:Important note

CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authority (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications).

CVSS v3 Score Breakdown

Red HatNVDcve.org
Base Score7.17.17.1
Attack VectorLocalLocalLocal
Attack ComplexityLowLowLow
Privileges RequiredNoneNoneNone
User InteractionRequiredRequiredRequired
ScopeUnchangedUnchangedUnchanged
ConfidentialityHighHighHigh
Integrity ImpactHighHighHigh
Availability ImpactNoneNoneNone

Vector

Red Hat: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

NVD: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

cve.org: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Understanding the Weakness (CWE)

Integrity,Confidentiality,Availability

Technical Impact: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands

The attacker may be able to create or overwrite critical files that are used to execute code, such as programs or libraries.

Integrity

Technical Impact: Modify Files or Directories

The attacker may be able to overwrite or create critical files, such as programs, libraries, or important data. If the targeted file is used for a security mechanism, then the attacker may be able to bypass that mechanism. For example, appending a new account at the end of a password file may allow an attacker to bypass authentication.

Confidentiality

Technical Impact: Read Files or Directories

The attacker may be able read the contents of unexpected files and expose sensitive data. If the targeted file is used for a security mechanism, then the attacker may be able to bypass that mechanism. For example, by reading a password file, the attacker could conduct brute force password guessing attacks in order to break into an account on the system.

Availability

Technical Impact: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart

The attacker may be able to overwrite, delete, or corrupt unexpected critical files such as programs, libraries, or important data. This may prevent the product from working at all and in the case of protection mechanisms such as authentication, it has the potential to lock out product users.

Frequently Asked Questions

Want to get errata notifications? Sign up here.