CVE-2020-5398

Public on

Last Modified: UTC

Description

A flaw was found in springframework in versions prior to 5.0.16, 5.1.13, and 5.2.3. A reflected file download (RFD) attack is possible when a "Content-Disposition" header is set in response to where the filename attribute is derived from user supplied input. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability.

A flaw was found in springframework in versions prior to 5.0.16, 5.1.13, and 5.2.3. A reflected file download (RFD) attack is possible when a "Content-Disposition" header is set in response to where the filename attribute is derived from user supplied input. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability.

Statement

This issue does not affect the version of SpringFramework (embedded in rhevm-dependencies) shipped with Red Hat Gluster Storage 3, as it does not provide support for spring-web. This issue does not affect the version of SpringFramework (embedded in rhvm-dependencies) shipped with Red Hat Virtualization, as it does not provide support for spring-web.

This issue does not affect the version of SpringFramework (embedded in rhevm-dependencies) shipped with Red Hat Gluster Storage 3, as it does not provide support for spring-web.

This issue does not affect the version of SpringFramework (embedded in rhvm-dependencies) shipped with Red Hat Virtualization, as it does not provide support for spring-web.

Additional information

  • Bugzilla 1799475: springframework: RFD attack via Content-Disposition Header sourced from request input by Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux Application
  • CWE-494->CWE-79: Download of Code Without Integrity Check leads to Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
  • FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2020-5398

Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details

Important note

CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authority (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications).

CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
Red HatNVD

CVSS v3 Base Score

8

7.5

Attack Vector

Network

Network

Attack Complexity

High

High

Privileges Required

Low

None

User Interaction

Required

Required

Scope

Changed

Unchanged

Confidentiality Impact

High

High

Integrity Impact

High

High

Availability Impact

High

High

CVSS v3 Vector

Red Hat: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

NVD: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?

My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?

What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?

What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?

What is a mitigation?

I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?

Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?

My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?

Want to get errata notifications? Sign up here.