CVE-2019-16276
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
It was discovered that net/http (through net/textproto) in golang does not correctly interpret HTTP requests where an HTTP header contains spaces before the colon. This could be abused by an attacker to smuggle HTTP requests when a proxy or a firewall is placed behind a server implemented in Go or to filter bypasses depending on the specific network configuration.
Statement
- This issue affects the versions of golang as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7, however it was deprecated in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.6 and it does not receive updates anymore. Developers are encouraged to use the Go Toolset instead, which is available through the Red Hat Developer program. See https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html/7.6_release_notes/chap-red_hat_enterprise_linux-7.6_release_notes-other_deprecated_functionality#idm140555585405248.
- The version of golang provided in Red Hat Gluster Storage 3, Red Hat Ceph Storage 2 and Red Hat Ceph Storage 3 allows filter bypasses or request smuggling and contains the vulnerable code hence affected by this vulnerability.
- In OpenShift Container Platform, all packages and container images built with a vulnerable version of Go and use the net/http package are affected by this flaw.
Additional information
- Bugzilla 1755969: golang: HTTP/1.1 headers with a space before the colon leads to filter bypass or request smuggling
- CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2019-16276
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authority (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications).
Red Hat | NVD | |
---|---|---|
CVSS v3 Base Score | 6.5 | 7.5 |
Attack Vector | Network | Network |
Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
Privileges Required | None | None |
User Interaction | Required | None |
Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
Confidentiality Impact | None | None |
Integrity Impact | High | High |
Availability Impact | None | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
NVD: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.
Want to get errata notifications? Sign up here.