CVE-2011-0281

Public on

Last Modified: UTC

Description

The CVE Program describes this issue as:

The unparse implementation in the Key Distribution Center (KDC) in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.6.x through 1.9, when an LDAP backend is used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (file descriptor exhaustion and daemon hang) via a principal name that triggers use of a backslash escape sequence, as demonstrated by a \n sequence.

Statement

This issue did not affect the versions of krb5 as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 or 4 as they did not include support for the LDAP backend.

This issue did not affect the versions of krb5 as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 or 4 as they did not include support for the LDAP backend.

Additional information

  • Bugzilla 668719: krb5: KDC hang when using LDAP backend caused by special principal name (MITKRB5-SA-2011-002)
  • FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2011-0281

Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details

Important note

CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authority (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications).

CVSS v2 Score Breakdown
Red HatNVD

CVSS v2 Base Score

5

5

Attack Vector

Network

Network

Access Complexity

Low

Low

Authentication

None

None

Confidentiality Impact

None

None

Integrity Impact

None

None

Availability Impact

Partial

Partial

CVSS v2 Vector

Red Hat: AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

NVD: AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

Acknowledgements

Red Hat would like to thank MIT Kerberos project for reporting this issue.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?

My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?

What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?

What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?

What is a mitigation?

I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?

Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?

Want to get errata notifications? Sign up here.