CVE-2026-88648
Description
A flaw was found in GnuTLS. An attacker controlling a subordinate Certificate Authority (CA) can exploit an incomplete X.509 certificate validation mechanism to bypass cross-domain Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) restrictions. This allows unauthorized certificates to be accepted as valid, potentially enabling the attacker to impersonate trusted domains and intercept secure communications.
Statement
This flaw is rated Moderate by Red Hat Product Security. GnuTLS performs incomplete X.509 certificate validation, which allows an attacker who controls a subordinate Certificate Authority (CA) to bypass cross-domain Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) restrictions and issue unauthorized certificates for domains outside that CA's scope. Applications that use GnuTLS to validate certificates may accept such forged certificates as valid, enabling the attacker to impersonate trusted domains and intercept or tamper with TLS-protected communications, with high impact to confidentiality and integrity and no direct impact on availability. Exploitation is complex: it requires the attacker to already control a subordinate CA within the target's trust hierarchy and to be in a position to intercept or redirect the target's network connections. Affected Red Hat products include Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 through 10 (including the mingw-gnutls variant), Red Hat Hardened Images, and Fedora, where GnuTLS is used for X.509 path validation; fixes for these affected products are being pursued through their respective product streams. The Red Hat CVSS 3.1 score for this flaw is 7.4 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N); the overall impact rating is Moderate because successful exploitation depends on control of a trusted subordinate CA and a network interception position.
Mitigation
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Info alert:Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authority (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications).
The following CVSS metrics and score provided are preliminary and subject to review.
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base Score | 7.4 | N/A | N/A |
| Attack Vector | Network | N/A | N/A |
| Attack Complexity | High | N/A | N/A |
| Privileges Required | None | N/A | N/A |
| User Interaction | None | N/A | N/A |
| Scope | Unchanged | N/A | N/A |
| Confidentiality | High | N/A | N/A |
| Integrity Impact | High | N/A | N/A |
| Availability Impact | None | N/A | N/A |
Vector
Red Hat: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Understanding the Weakness (CWE)
Integrity,Authentication
Technical Impact: Bypass Protection Mechanism; Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
When a certificate is invalid or malicious, it might allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by interfering in the communication path between the host and client. The product might connect to a malicious host while believing it is a trusted host, or the product might be deceived into accepting spoofed data that appears to originate from a trusted host.
Frequently Asked Questions
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.
Want to get errata notifications? Sign up here.