CVE-2026-81934

Description

A flaw was found in Redis. This vulnerability, a use-after-free, exists within the tlsProcessPendingData() function, which manages the Transport Layer Security (TLS) pending-data list when Redis is configured with TLS support. A remote, unauthenticated attacker could exploit this to execute unauthorized commands with the same privileges as the Redis server.

Statement

This is an Important flaw in Redis, enabling remote, unauthenticated attackers to achieve arbitrary code execution. The vulnerability specifically impacts Redis instances configured with TLS support, which is not enabled by default in Red Hat Enterprise Linux, thereby limiting exposure in standard deployments.

Mitigation

For Redis instances where TLS is enabled, consider disabling TLS if it is not strictly required. Alternatively, restrict network access to the Redis server to trusted clients only, using firewall rules or network access controls, to prevent unauthenticated remote attackers from reaching the vulnerable service. If TLS is enabled, a restart of the Redis service may be required for changes to take effect.

Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details

Info alert:Important note

CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authority (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications).

CVSS v3 Score Breakdown

Red HatNVDcve.org
Base Score7.5N/A7.1
Attack VectorNetworkN/AAdjacent Network
Attack ComplexityHighN/AHigh
Privileges RequiredLowN/ALow
User InteractionNoneN/ANone
ScopeUnchangedN/AUnchanged
ConfidentialityHighN/AHigh
Integrity ImpactHighN/AHigh
Availability ImpactHighN/AHigh

Vector

Red Hat: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

cve.org: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Understanding the Weakness (CWE)

Integrity

Technical Impact: Modify Memory

The use of previously freed memory may corrupt valid data, if the memory area in question has been allocated and used properly elsewhere.

Availability

Technical Impact: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart

If chunk consolidation occurs after the use of previously freed data, the process may crash when invalid data is used as chunk information.

Confidentiality

Technical Impact: Read Memory

Read operations on freed memory can sometimes leak sensitive information instead of causing a crash

Integrity,Confidentiality,Availability

Technical Impact: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands

If malicious data is entered before chunk consolidation can take place, it may be possible to take advantage of a write-what-where primitive to execute arbitrary code. If the newly allocated data happens to hold a class, in C++ for example, various function pointers may be scattered within the heap data. If one of these function pointers is overwritten with an address to valid shellcode, execution of arbitrary code can be achieved.

Frequently Asked Questions

Want to get errata notifications? Sign up here.