CVE-2026-50237

Description

A Server-Side Request Forgery and supply chain flaw was found in the OpenShift Console Helm catalog proxy. A namespace tenant can plant a ProjectHelmChartRepository with an arbitrary URL that the console pod fetches server-side, bypassing tenant egress restrictions. Combined with catalog metadata poisoning and admin-mediated chart installation, this enables privilege escalation.

Mitigation

Review existing ProjectHelmChartRepository resources in tenant namespaces for unexpected URLs using: oc get projecthelmchartrepositories --all-namespaces -o jsonpath='{range .items[*]}{.metadata.namespace}/{.metadata.name}: {.spec.connectionConfig.url}{"\n"}{end}'. Apply NetworkPolicy egress restrictions to the openshift-console namespace (note: requires allow-listing required console egress targets). Administrators should verify chart provenance before installing Helm charts from namespace-scoped repositories. Disable or restrict ProjectHelmChartRepository creation via RBAC if namespace tenants do not require custom Helm repositories.

Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details

Info alert:Important note

CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authority (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications).

The following CVSS metrics and score provided are preliminary and subject to review.

CVSS v3 Score Breakdown

Red HatNVDcve.org
Base Score7.4N/A7.4
Attack VectorNetworkN/ANetwork
Attack ComplexityLowN/ALow
Privileges RequiredLowN/ALow
User InteractionNoneN/ANone
ScopeChangedN/AChanged
ConfidentialityLowN/ALow
Integrity ImpactLowN/ALow
Availability ImpactLowN/ALow

Vector

Red Hat: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

cve.org: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Understanding the Weakness (CWE)

Confidentiality

Technical Impact: Read Application Data

Integrity

Technical Impact: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands

Access Control

Technical Impact: Bypass Protection Mechanism

By providing URLs to unexpected hosts or ports, attackers can make it appear that the server is sending the request, possibly bypassing access controls such as firewalls that prevent the attackers from accessing the URLs directly. The server can be used as a proxy to conduct port scanning of hosts in internal networks, use other URLs such as that can access documents on the system (using file://), or use other protocols such as gopher:// or tftp://, which may provide greater control over the contents of requests.

Acknowledgements

Red Hat would like to thank Christopher Lusk (North Echo Security Research) for reporting this issue.

Frequently Asked Questions

Want to get errata notifications? Sign up here.