CVE-2026-47864
Description
A flaw was found in Spring Integration. The SerializingHttpMessageConverter component deserializes incoming HTTP request bodies without proper class filtering. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this by sending a specially crafted HTTP request. If a known Java deserialization 'gadget' is present on the application's classpath, this can lead to arbitrary code execution.
Statement
An unsafe Java deserialization vulnerability exists in Spring Integration's SerializingHttpMessageConverter. When processing HTTP requests with Content-Type application/x-java-serialized-object, the converter invokes ObjectInputStream.readObject() on the request body without class filtering or type validation. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can supply a malicious serialized payload. If a suitable Java deserialization gadget exists on the application's classpath, this leads to arbitrary code execution within the context of the underlying Java process.
Mitigation
Do not accept application/x-java-serialized-object content types on HTTP inbound endpoints, or configure custom HttpMessageConverter instances that enforce explicit ObjectInputFilter allowlists before deserialization occurs.
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Info alert:Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authority (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications).
The following CVSS metrics and score provided are preliminary and subject to review.
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base Score | 8.1 | 9.8 | 6.4 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | High | Low | High |
| Privileges Required | None | None | Low |
| User Interaction | None | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality | High | High | High |
| Integrity Impact | High | High | Low |
| Availability Impact | High | High | Low |
Vector
Red Hat: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVD: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cve.org: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Understanding the Weakness (CWE)
Integrity
Technical Impact: Modify Application Data; Unexpected State
Attackers can modify unexpected objects or data that was assumed to be safe from modification. Deserialized data or code could be modified without using the provided accessor functions, or unexpected functions could be invoked.
Availability
Technical Impact: DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)
If a function is making an assumption on when to terminate, based on a sentry in a string, it could easily never terminate.
Other
Technical Impact: Varies by Context
The consequences can vary widely, because it depends on which objects or methods are being deserialized, and how they are used. Making an assumption that the code in the deserialized object is valid is dangerous and can enable exploitation. One example is attackers using gadget chains to perform unauthorized actions, such as generating a shell.
Frequently Asked Questions
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.
Want to get errata notifications? Sign up here.