CVE-2026-41853

Description

A flaw was found in Spring MVC and WebFlux applications, components of the Spring Framework. This vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to perform Multipart request smuggling attacks. Such an attack can lead to a low integrity impact, potentially enabling the attacker to bypass security controls or modify data.

Statement

This Moderate-impact flaw in Spring MVC and WebFlux applications allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to conduct Multipart request smuggling. This can lead to bypassing security controls or modifying data, affecting the integrity of applications utilizing these Spring Framework components.

Mitigation

Users of affected versions should upgrade to the corresponding fixed version.

Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details

Info alert:Important note

CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authority (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications).

The following CVSS metrics and score provided are preliminary and subject to review.

CVSS v3 Score Breakdown

Red HatNVDcve.org
Base Score5.3N/A5.3
Attack VectorNetworkN/ANetwork
Attack ComplexityLowN/ALow
Privileges RequiredNoneN/ANone
User InteractionNoneN/ANone
ScopeUnchangedN/AUnchanged
ConfidentialityNoneN/ANone
Integrity ImpactLowN/ALow
Availability ImpactNoneN/ANone

Vector

Red Hat: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

cve.org: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Understanding the Weakness (CWE)

Integrity,Non-Repudiation,Access Control

Technical Impact: Unexpected State; Hide Activities; Bypass Protection Mechanism

An attacker could create HTTP messages to exploit a number of weaknesses including 1) the message can trick the web server to associate a URL with another URL's webpage and caching the contents of the webpage (web cache poisoning attack), 2) the message can be structured to bypass the firewall protection mechanisms and gain unauthorized access to a web application, and 3) the message can invoke a script or a page that returns client credentials (similar to a Cross Site Scripting attack).

Frequently Asked Questions

Want to get errata notifications? Sign up here.