CVE-2025-67269

Description

A flaw was found in gpsd. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted NAVCOM packet. When parsing the packet, an error in calculating the payload length can cause the system to attempt to process an extremely large amount of data. This leads to excessive CPU utilization, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS) condition where the system becomes unresponsive.

Statement

This vulnerability is rated Important for Red Hat because gpsd is susceptible to a remote denial-of-service condition triggered through malformed NAVCOM packets processed from untrusted input sources. A specially crafted packet can induce an unsigned integer underflow during packet length calculation in the NAVCOM parsing state machine, resulting in an excessively large length value and causing the parser to enter a non-terminating read state. Although the flaw does not directly lead to memory corruption, its severity is elevated because it affects a core parsing path that continuously processes streaming input and can be exploited with a single malformed packet, without authentication or sustained attacker interaction. The resulting sustained 100% CPU utilization renders the gpsd service unresponsive to all dependent clients, impacting system functionality wherever gpsd is exposed to network-based inputs or externally influenced serial devices.

Mitigation

No mitigation is currently available that meets Red Hat Product Security’s standards for usability, deployment, applicability, or stability.

Exposure can be reduced by restricting gpsd from listening on network sockets, limiting input sources to trusted serial devices only, and ensuring the service is not accessible from untrusted networks. Deployments that do not require NAVCOM packet support should consider disabling or filtering such input where possible to further minimize risk.

Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details

Info alert:Important note

CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authority (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications).

CVSS v3 Score Breakdown

Red HatNVDcve.org
Base Score7.5N/A7.5
Attack VectorNetworkN/ANetwork
Attack ComplexityLowN/ALow
Privileges RequiredNoneN/ANone
User InteractionNoneN/ANone
ScopeUnchangedN/AUnchanged
ConfidentialityNoneN/ANone
Integrity ImpactNoneN/ANone
Availability ImpactHighN/AHigh

Vector

Red Hat: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

cve.org: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Understanding the Weakness (CWE)

Availability

Technical Impact: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart; DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU); DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory); DoS: Instability

This weakness will generally lead to undefined behavior and therefore crashes. In the case of overflows involving loop index variables, the likelihood of infinite loops is also high.

Integrity

Technical Impact: Modify Memory

If the value in question is important to data (as opposed to flow), simple data corruption has occurred. Also, if the wrap around results in other conditions such as buffer overflows, further memory corruption may occur.

Confidentiality,Availability,Access Control

Technical Impact: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands; Bypass Protection Mechanism

This weakness can sometimes trigger buffer overflows which can be used to execute arbitrary code. This is usually outside the scope of a program's implicit security policy.

Frequently Asked Questions

Want to get errata notifications? Sign up here.