CVE-2025-40778
Description
A vulnerability exists in BIND’s DNS resolver logic that makes it overly permissive when accepting resource records (RRs) in responses. Under certain conditions, this flaw allows attackers to inject unsolicited or forged DNS records into the cache. This can be exploited to poison the resolver cache, redirecting clients to malicious domains or unauthorized servers.
Statement
It is classified as Important rather than Critical because its impact is limited to cache poisoning within recursive resolvers and does not allow direct code execution, privilege escalation, or service disruption. The vulnerability affects the accuracy of DNS responses, but not the availability or confidentiality of systems. Additionally, DNSSEC-enabled deployments and restricted recursive access can significantly mitigate exploitation risks. Therefore, while the flaw can misdirect network traffic and compromise trust in name resolution, it does not directly compromise the underlying server or client systems, justifying an Important — but not Critical — severity rating.
Technical Analysis: The issue arises because BIND fails to strictly validate unsolicited resource records accompanying legitimate DNS responses. This gap allows forged recursive resolvers to be cached as valid entries. Since the attack is remote, requires no authentication, and exploits a low-complexity vector, it is highly impactful in recursive resolver environments—especially those exposed to untrusted clients or open resolvers.
Mitigation
While it is not possible to eliminate risk from this vulnerability, there are several options for reducing the risk. These include restricting recursive queries to trusted or internal networks only, and apply rate limiting or firewall rules to prevent excessive or repetitive requests. Enabling DNSSEC validation helps reject forged records, while isolating recursive resolvers from authoritative servers limits the impact of potential cache poisoning. Active monitoring of CPU usage, query volume, and cache anomalies can provide early warning of abuse or attacks.
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Info alert:Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authority (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications).
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base Score | 8.6 | N/A | 8.6 |
| Attack Vector | Network | N/A | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | N/A | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | N/A | None |
| User Interaction | None | N/A | None |
| Scope | Changed | N/A | Changed |
| Confidentiality | None | N/A | None |
| Integrity Impact | High | N/A | High |
| Availability Impact | None | N/A | None |
Vector
Red Hat: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
cve.org: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
Understanding the Weakness (CWE)
Access Control,Integrity,Confidentiality
Technical Impact: Gain Privileges or Assume Identity; Modify Application Data; Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
An attacker could gain access to sensitive data and possibly execute unauthorized code.
Frequently Asked Questions
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.
Want to get errata notifications? Sign up here.
