CVE-2025-39932
Description
From CVE.org
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: client: let smbd_destroy() call disable_work_sync(&info->post_send_credits_work) In smbd_destroy() we may destroy the memory so we better wait until post_send_credits_work is no longer pending and will never be started again. I actually just hit the case using rxe: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 138 at drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_verbs.c:1032 rxe_post_recv+0x1ee/0x480 [rdma_rxe] ... [ 5305.686979] [ T138] smbd_post_recv+0x445/0xc10 [cifs] [ 5305.687135] [ T138] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 5305.687149] [ T138] ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x30 [ 5305.687185] [ T138] ? __pfx_smbd_post_recv+0x10/0x10 [cifs] [ 5305.687329] [ T138] ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x10/0x10 [ 5305.687356] [ T138] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 5305.687368] [ T138] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 5305.687378] [ T138] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x11/0x60 [ 5305.687389] [ T138] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 5305.687399] [ T138] ? get_receive_buffer+0x168/0x210 [cifs] [ 5305.687555] [ T138] smbd_post_send_credits+0x382/0x4b0 [cifs] [ 5305.687701] [ T138] ? __pfx_smbd_post_send_credits+0x10/0x10 [cifs] [ 5305.687855] [ T138] ? __pfx___schedule+0x10/0x10 [ 5305.687865] [ T138] ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock_irq+0x10/0x10 [ 5305.687875] [ T138] ? queue_delayed_work_on+0x8e/0xa0 [ 5305.687889] [ T138] process_one_work+0x629/0xf80 [ 5305.687908] [ T138] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 5305.687917] [ T138] ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x30 [ 5305.687933] [ T138] worker_thread+0x87f/0x1570 ... It means rxe_post_recv was called after rdma_destroy_qp(). This happened because put_receive_buffer() was triggered by ib_drain_qp() and called: queue_work(info->workqueue, &info->post_send_credits_work);
Statement
A race in the SMB Direct client allowed post_send_credits_work to be queued/run after RDMA resources were destroyed in smbd_destroy(), potentially leading to a kernel use-after-free and system crash. A malicious SMB server reachable over RDMA (including SoftRoCE/rxe) could trigger client-side DoS once an SMB Direct session exists (so the attack from server to client only could be).
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Info alert:Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authority (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications).
The following CVSS metrics and score provided are preliminary and subject to review.
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base Score | 5.7 | 5.5 | 9.8 |
| Attack Vector | Adjacent Network | Local | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | Low | None |
| User Interaction | Required | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality | None | None | High |
| Integrity Impact | None | None | High |
| Availability Impact | High | High | High |
Vector
Red Hat: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
NVD: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cve.org: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Understanding the Weakness (CWE)
Availability
Technical Impact: DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU); DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory); DoS: Resource Consumption (Other)
When a race condition makes it possible to bypass a resource cleanup routine or trigger multiple initialization routines, it may lead to resource exhaustion.
Availability
Technical Impact: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart; DoS: Instability
When a race condition allows multiple control flows to access a resource simultaneously, it might lead the product(s) into unexpected states, possibly resulting in a crash.
Confidentiality,Integrity
Technical Impact: Read Files or Directories; Read Application Data
When a race condition is combined with predictable resource names and loose permissions, it may be possible for an attacker to overwrite or access confidential data (CWE-59).
Access Control
Technical Impact: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands; Gain Privileges or Assume Identity; Bypass Protection Mechanism
This can have security implications when the expected synchronization is in security-critical code, such as recording whether a user is authenticated or modifying important state information that should not be influenced by an outsider.
Frequently Asked Questions
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.
Want to get errata notifications? Sign up here.
