CVE-2023-29402

Description

A flaw was found in golang. The go command may generate unexpected code at build time when using cgo. This may result in unexpected behavior when running a go program that uses cgo. This can occur when running an untrusted module that contains directories with newline characters in their names. Modules that are retrieved using the go command, for example, via "go get", are not affected. Modules retrieved using GOPATH-mode, for example, GO111MODULE=off may be affected.

Statement

This vulnerability is only applicable to customer use of the go compiler and not any pre-compiled golang binaries shipped by Red Hat.

Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details

Info alert:Important note

CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authority (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications).

CVSS v3 Score Breakdown

Red HatNVDcve.org
Base Score79.89.8
Attack VectorLocalNetworkNetwork
Attack ComplexityHighLowLow
Privileges RequiredNoneNoneNone
User InteractionRequiredNoneNone
ScopeUnchangedUnchangedUnchanged
ConfidentialityHighHighHigh
Integrity ImpactHighHighHigh
Availability ImpactHighHighHigh

Vector

Red Hat: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

NVD: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

cve.org: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Red Hat CVSS v3 Score Explanation

AC:H as modules downloaded via the go command (i.e. "go get" which the vast majority of modules are retrieved with) are not affected, meaning the vulnerable package would have had to been added to the local package cache via other means.

UI:R as user interaction is required to start the compilation process.

AV:L as modules retrieved via the go command are not affected, meaning the vulnerable package would have had to been added to the local package before compilation.

Understanding the Weakness (CWE)

Access Control

Technical Impact: Bypass Protection Mechanism

In some cases, injectable code controls authentication; this may lead to a remote vulnerability.

Access Control

Technical Impact: Gain Privileges or Assume Identity

Injected code can access resources that the attacker is directly prevented from accessing.

Integrity,Confidentiality,Availability

Technical Impact: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands

When a product allows a user's input to contain code syntax, it might be possible for an attacker to craft the code in such a way that it will alter the intended control flow of the product. As a result, code injection can often result in the execution of arbitrary code. Code injection attacks can also lead to loss of data integrity in nearly all cases, since the control-plane data injected is always incidental to data recall or writing.

Non-Repudiation

Technical Impact: Hide Activities

Often the actions performed by injected control code are unlogged.

Frequently Asked Questions

Want to get errata notifications? Sign up here.