CVE-2021-47536
Description
From CVE.org
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/smc: fix wrong list_del in smc_lgr_cleanup_early smc_lgr_cleanup_early() meant to delete the link group from the link group list, but it deleted the list head by mistake. This may cause memory corruption since we didn't remove the real link group from the list and later memseted the link group structure. We got a list corruption panic when testing: [ 231.277259] list_del corruption. prev->next should be ffff8881398a8000, but was 0000000000000000 [ 231.278222] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 231.278726] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:53! [ 231.279326] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI [ 231.279803] CPU: 0 PID: 5 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 5.10.46+ #435 [ 231.280466] Hardware name: Alibaba Cloud ECS, BIOS 8c24b4c 04/01/2014 [ 231.281248] Workqueue: events smc_link_down_work [ 231.281732] RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid+0x70/0x90 [ 231.282258] Code: 4c 60 82 e8 7d cc 6a 00 0f 0b 48 89 fe 48 c7 c7 88 4c 60 82 e8 6c cc 6a 00 0f 0b 48 89 fe 48 c7 c7 c0 4c 60 82 e8 5b cc 6a 00 <0f> 0b 48 89 fe 48 c7 c7 00 4d 60 82 e8 4a cc 6a 00 0f 0b cc cc cc [ 231.284146] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000033d58 EFLAGS: 00010292 [ 231.284685] RAX: 0000000000000054 RBX: ffff8881398a8000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 231.285415] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffff88813bc18040 RDI: ffff88813bc18040 [ 231.286141] RBP: ffffffff8305ad40 R08: 0000000000000003 R09: 0000000000000001 [ 231.286873] R10: ffffffff82803da0 R11: ffffc90000033b90 R12: 0000000000000001 [ 231.287606] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8881398a8000 R15: 0000000000000003 [ 231.288337] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88813bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 231.289160] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 231.289754] CR2: 0000000000e72058 CR3: 000000010fa96006 CR4: 00000000003706f0 [ 231.290485] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 231.291211] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 231.291940] Call Trace: [ 231.292211] smc_lgr_terminate_sched+0x53/0xa0 [ 231.292677] smc_switch_conns+0x75/0x6b0 [ 231.293085] ? update_load_avg+0x1a6/0x590 [ 231.293517] ? ttwu_do_wakeup+0x17/0x150 [ 231.293907] ? update_load_avg+0x1a6/0x590 [ 231.294317] ? newidle_balance+0xca/0x3d0 [ 231.294716] smcr_link_down+0x50/0x1a0 [ 231.295090] ? __wake_up_common_lock+0x77/0x90 [ 231.295534] smc_link_down_work+0x46/0x60 [ 231.295933] process_one_work+0x18b/0x350
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Info alert:Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authority (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications).
The following CVSS metrics and score provided are preliminary and subject to review.
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base Score | 4.4 | 7.8 | N/A |
| Attack Vector | Local | Local | N/A |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low | N/A |
| Privileges Required | Low | Low | N/A |
| User Interaction | None | None | N/A |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged | N/A |
| Confidentiality | None | High | N/A |
| Integrity Impact | Low | High | N/A |
| Availability Impact | Low | High | N/A |
Vector
Red Hat: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
NVD: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Understanding the Weakness (CWE)
Integrity,Confidentiality,Availability
Technical Impact: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands; Modify Memory
If the memory accessible by the attacker can be effectively controlled, it may be possible to execute arbitrary code, as with a standard buffer overflow. If the attacker can overwrite a pointer's worth of memory (usually 32 or 64 bits), they can alter the intended control flow by redirecting a function pointer to their own malicious code. Even when the attacker can only modify a single byte arbitrary code execution can be possible. Sometimes this is because the same problem can be exploited repeatedly to the same effect. Other times it is because the attacker can overwrite security-critical application-specific data -- such as a flag indicating whether the user is an administrator.
Availability,Confidentiality
Technical Impact: Read Memory; DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart; DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU); DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
Out of bounds memory access will very likely result in the corruption of relevant memory, and perhaps instructions, possibly leading to a crash. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop.
Confidentiality
Technical Impact: Read Memory
In the case of an out-of-bounds read, the attacker may have access to sensitive information. If the sensitive information contains system details, such as the current buffer's position in memory, this knowledge can be used to craft further attacks, possibly with more severe consequences.
Frequently Asked Questions
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.
Want to get errata notifications? Sign up here.
