CVE-2018-20673

Public on

Last Modified: UTC

Description

The CVE Program describes this issue as:

The demangle_template function in cplus-dem.c in GNU libiberty, as distributed in GNU Binutils 2.31.1, contains an integer overflow vulnerability (for "Create an array for saving the template argument values") that can trigger a heap-based buffer overflow, as demonstrated by nm.

Statement

This issue did not affect the versions of gdb as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 and with Red Hat Developer Toolset 7 and 8 as they are compiled only for 64bit architectures, where the flaw is not present. This vulnerability has been rated as Low severity for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8, as the circumstances to exploit are particularly unlikely. A crafted binary file must be passed to one of the affected tools, in a 32-bit environment, and in a scenario where the corrupted file comes from an untrusted source. In 64 bit environments, exploitation is not possible.

This issue did not affect the versions of gdb as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 and with Red Hat Developer Toolset 7 and 8 as they are compiled only for 64bit architectures, where the flaw is not present.

This vulnerability has been rated as Low severity for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8, as the circumstances to exploit are particularly unlikely. A crafted binary file must be passed to one of the affected tools, in a 32-bit environment, and in a scenario where the corrupted file comes from an untrusted source. In 64 bit environments, exploitation is not possible.

Additional information

  • Bugzilla 1664709: libiberty: Integer overflow in demangle_template() function
  • CWE-190->CWE-122: Integer Overflow or Wraparound leads to Heap-based Buffer Overflow
  • FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2018-20673

Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details

Important note

CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authority (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications).

CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
Red HatNVD

CVSS v3 Base Score

5.3

5.5

Attack Vector

Local

Local

Attack Complexity

Low

Low

Privileges Required

None

None

User Interaction

Required

Required

Scope

Unchanged

Unchanged

Confidentiality Impact

Low

None

Integrity Impact

Low

None

Availability Impact

Low

High

CVSS v3 Vector

Red Hat: CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

NVD: CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?

My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?

What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?

What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?

What is a mitigation?

I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?

Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?

Want to get errata notifications? Sign up here.