CVE-2015-1855

Description

It was discovered that the Ruby OpenSSL extension was overly permissive when verifying host names against X.509 certificate names with wildcards. This could cause Ruby TLS/SSL clients to accept certain certificates as valid, which is a violation of the RFC 6125 recommendations.

Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details

Info alert:Important note

CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authority (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications).

The following CVSS metrics and score provided are preliminary and subject to review.

CVSS v2 Score Breakdown

Red HatNVDcve.org
Base Score44.3N/A
Attack VectorNetworkNetworkN/A
Access ComplexityHighMediumN/A
AuthenticationNoneNoneN/A
Confidentiality ImpactPartialNoneN/A
Integrity ImpactPartialPartialN/A
Availability ImpactNoneNoneN/A

Vector

Red Hat: AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N

NVD: AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N

Understanding the Weakness (CWE)

Access Control

Technical Impact: Gain Privileges or Assume Identity

The data read from the system vouched for by the certificate may not be from the expected system.

Authentication,Other

Technical Impact: Other

Trust afforded to the system in question - based on the malicious certificate - may allow for spoofing or redirection attacks.

Access Control,Other

Technical Impact: Gain Privileges or Assume Identity; Other

If the certificate's host-specific data is not properly checked - such as the Common Name (CN) in the Subject or the Subject Alternative Name (SAN) extension of an X.509 certificate - it may be possible for a redirection or spoofing attack to allow a malicious host with a valid certificate to provide data, impersonating a trusted host.

Frequently Asked Questions

Want to get errata notifications? Sign up here.