CVE-2014-0105

Public on

Last Modified: UTC

ImportantImportant ImpactWhat does this mean?

Insights vulnerability analysis

View exposed systems

Description

The CVE Program describes this issue as:

The auth_token middleware in the OpenStack Python client library for Keystone (aka python-keystoneclient) before 0.7.0 does not properly retrieve user tokens from memcache, which allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges in opportunistic circumstances via a large number of requests, related to an "interaction between eventlet and python-memcached."

Additional information

  • Bugzilla 1082165: python-keystoneclient: Potential context confusion in Keystone middleware
  • FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2014-0105

Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details

Important note

CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authority (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications).

CVSS v2 Score Breakdown
Red HatNVD

CVSS v2 Base Score

4.3

6

Attack Vector

Network

Network

Access Complexity

Medium

Medium

Authentication

None

Single

Confidentiality Impact

None

Partial

Integrity Impact

Partial

Partial

Availability Impact

None

Partial

CVSS v2 Vector

Red Hat: AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N

NVD: AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P

Acknowledgements

Red Hat would like to thank OpenStack project for reporting this issue. Upstream acknowledges Kieran Spear (University of Melbourne) as the original reporter.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?

My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?

What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?

What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?

What is a mitigation?

I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?

Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?

Want to get errata notifications? Sign up here.