Select Your Language

Infrastructure and Management

Cloud Computing

Storage

Runtimes

Integration and Automation

  • Comments
  • firewalld: Question on Usage (Best Practices/Opinion )

    Posted on

    As I get more requests in from my customers to help them automate the deployments of their applications, I'm dealing more with firewalld rules. Initially, when I've been adding ports for applications, I'd been using the

    firewall-cmd --permanent --add-port=NNN/proto
    method. As I was poking around teh intarwebz researching other problems (SELinux can make running firewall commands via boot-init scripts a bit of a pain). At any rate, I'd stumbled on a document that covered creating service-definitions so that a given application might have all its port needs satisfied by
    firewall-cmd --permanent --add-service=
    . When dealing with applications that have need of multiple ports/protocols/etc., distributing a service definition-file and then activating that single service seems like a no-brainer. Just wonder if there's shortcomings to that method or whether anyone has any experience — positive or negative — using that method.

    by

    points

    Responses

    Red Hat LinkedIn YouTube Facebook X, formerly Twitter

    Quick Links

    Help

    Site Info

    Related Sites

    © 2025 Red Hat