CVE-2024-32002

Public on

Last Modified: UTC

Description

A vulnerability was found in Git. This vulnerability allows the malicious manipulation of repositories containing submodules, exploiting a bug that enables the writing of files into the .git/ directory instead of the submodule's intended worktree. This manipulation facilitates the execution of arbitrary code during the cloning process, bypassing user inspection and control.

A vulnerability was found in Git. This vulnerability allows the malicious manipulation of repositories containing submodules, exploiting a bug that enables the writing of files into the .git/ directory instead of the submodule's intended worktree. This manipulation facilitates the execution of arbitrary code during the cloning process, bypassing user inspection and control.

Statement

While the described bug in Git presents a significant security concern, it falls short of being categorized as Critical due to several factors. The exploit requires a specific set of conditions, such as repositories with submodules and the presence of symbolic link support. Additionally, successful exploitation relies on users cloning repositories from untrusted sources, limiting its scope compared to critical vulnerabilities that may be remotely exploitable or affect a broader range of use cases. However, the potential impact of remote code execution during cloning operations underscores the importance of promptly applying patches and exercising caution when interacting with Git repositories, emphasizing its significant severity within the realm of software security.

While the described bug in Git presents a significant security concern, it falls short of being categorized as Critical due to several factors. The exploit requires a specific set of conditions, such as repositories with submodules and the presence of symbolic link support. Additionally, successful exploitation relies on users cloning repositories from untrusted sources, limiting its scope compared to critical vulnerabilities that may be remotely exploitable or affect a broader range of use cases. However, the potential impact of remote code execution during cloning operations underscores the importance of promptly applying patches and exercising caution when interacting with Git repositories, emphasizing its significant severity within the realm of software security.

Mitigation

One preventative measure is to disable symbolic link support. This can be accomplished by running the command git config --global core.symlinks false. Another temporary option is to avoid using the --recurse-submodules setting with untrusted git repos.

Additional information

  • Bugzilla 2280421: git: Recursive clones RCE
  • CWE-22->CWE-434: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') leads to Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type
  • FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2024-32002

Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details

Important note

CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authority (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications).

CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
Red HatNVD

CVSS v3 Base Score

9

9

Attack Vector

Network

Network

Attack Complexity

High

High

Privileges Required

None

None

User Interaction

None

None

Scope

Changed

Changed

Confidentiality Impact

High

High

Integrity Impact

High

High

Availability Impact

High

High

CVSS v3 Vector

Red Hat: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

NVD: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?

My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?

What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?

What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?

What is a mitigation?

I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?

Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?

Want to get errata notifications? Sign up here.