CVE-2022-23540

Public on

Last Modified: UTC

Description

A flaw was found in the jsonwebtoken library. In affected versions of the jsonwebtoken library, lack of algorithm definition and a falsy secret or key in the jwt.verify() function may lead to signature validation bypass due to defaulting to the none algorithm for signature verification.

A flaw was found in the jsonwebtoken library. In affected versions of the jsonwebtoken library, lack of algorithm definition and a falsy secret or key in the jwt.verify() function may lead to signature validation bypass due to defaulting to the none algorithm for signature verification.

Additional information

  • Bugzilla 2169378: jsonwebtoken: Insecure default algorithm in jwt.verify() could lead to signature validation bypass
  • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
  • FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2022-23540

Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details

Important note

CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authority (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications).

CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
Red HatNVD

CVSS v3 Base Score

6.4

7.6

Attack Vector

Network

Network

Attack Complexity

High

Low

Privileges Required

Low

Low

User Interaction

None

None

Scope

Unchanged

Unchanged

Confidentiality Impact

Low

Low

Integrity Impact

High

High

Availability Impact

Low

Low

CVSS v3 Vector

Red Hat: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L

NVD: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L

Red Hat CVSS v3 Score Explanation

To exploit this vulnerability an authenticated user needs to send a specially crafted request to bypass the signature validation. Hence, AC:H and PR:L. Confidentiality and Availability metrics are Low, because: - Successful exploitation may lead to some loss of confidentiality, but it's not under the attacker's control what information will be obtained. - An attacker is not able to determine if successful exploitation will affect the availability of the target environment.

To exploit this vulnerability an authenticated user needs to send a specially crafted request to bypass the signature validation. Hence, AC:H and PR:L. Confidentiality and Availability metrics are Low, because:

  • Successful exploitation may lead to some loss of confidentiality, but it's not under the attacker's control what information will be obtained.
  • An attacker is not able to determine if successful exploitation will affect the availability of the target environment.

Understanding the Weakness (CWE)

CWE-327

Confidentiality

Technical Impact: Read Application Data

The confidentiality of sensitive data may be compromised by the use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm.

Integrity

Technical Impact: Modify Application Data

The integrity of sensitive data may be compromised by the use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm.

Accountability,Non-Repudiation

Technical Impact: Hide Activities

If the cryptographic algorithm is used to ensure the identity of the source of the data (such as digital signatures), then a broken algorithm will compromise this scheme and the source of the data cannot be proven.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?

My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?

What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?

What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?

What is a mitigation?

I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?

Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?

My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?

Want to get errata notifications? Sign up here.