CVE-2022-49400

Public on

Last Modified: UTC

Description

The CVE Program describes this issue as:

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: md: Don't set mddev private to NULL in raid0 pers->free In normal stop process, it does like this: do_md_stop | __md_stop (pers->free(); mddev->private=NULL) | md_free (free mddev) __md_stop sets mddev->private to NULL after pers->free. The raid device will be stopped and mddev memory is free. But in reshape, it doesn't free the mddev and mddev will still be used in new raid. In reshape, it first sets mddev->private to new_pers and then runs old_pers->free(). Now raid0 sets mddev->private to NULL in raid0_free. The new raid can't work anymore. It will panic when dereference mddev->private because of NULL pointer dereference. It can panic like this: [63010.814972] kernel BUG at drivers/md/raid10.c:928! [63010.819778] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI [63010.825011] CPU: 3 PID: 44437 Comm: md0_resync Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.14.0-86.el9.x86_64 #1 [63010.833789] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R6415/07YXFK, BIOS 1.15.0 09/11/2020 [63010.841440] RIP: 0010:raise_barrier+0x161/0x170 [raid10] [63010.865508] RSP: 0018:ffffc312408bbc10 EFLAGS: 00010246 [63010.870734] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffa00bf7d39800 RCX: 0000000000000000 [63010.877866] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffa00bf7d39800 [63010.884999] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: fffffa4945e74400 R09: 0000000000000000 [63010.892132] R10: ffffa00eed02f798 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffa00bbc435200 [63010.899266] R13: ffffa00bf7d39800 R14: 0000000000000400 R15: 0000000000000003 [63010.906399] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa00eed000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [63010.914485] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [63010.920229] CR2: 00007f5cfbe99828 CR3: 0000000105efe000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 [63010.927363] Call Trace: [63010.929822] ? bio_reset+0xe/0x40 [63010.933144] ? raid10_alloc_init_r10buf+0x60/0xa0 [raid10] [63010.938629] raid10_sync_request+0x756/0x1610 [raid10] [63010.943770] md_do_sync.cold+0x3e4/0x94c [63010.947698] md_thread+0xab/0x160 [63010.951024] ? md_write_inc+0x50/0x50 [63010.954688] kthread+0x149/0x170 [63010.957923] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 [63010.962107] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Removing the code that sets mddev->private to NULL in raid0 can fix problem.

Additional information

  • Bugzilla 2348276: kernel: md: Don't set mddev private to NULL in raid0 pers->free

Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details

Important note

CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authority (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications).

The following CVSS metrics and score provided are preliminary and subject to review.

CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
Red HatNVD

CVSS v3 Base Score

5.5

N/A

Attack Vector

Local

N/A

Attack Complexity

Low

N/A

Privileges Required

Low

N/A

User Interaction

None

N/A

Scope

Unchanged

N/A

Confidentiality Impact

None

N/A

Integrity Impact

None

N/A

Availability Impact

High

N/A

CVSS v3 Vector

Red Hat: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?

My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?

What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?

What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?

What is a mitigation?

I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?

Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?

My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?

Want to get errata notifications? Sign up here.