CVE-2019-20433
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
The CVE Program describes this issue as:
libaspell.a in GNU Aspell before 0.60.8 has a buffer over-read for a string ending with a single '\0' byte, if the encoding is set to ucs-2 or ucs-4 outside of the application, as demonstrated by the ASPELL_CONF environment variable.
Additional information
- Bugzilla 1764299: aspell: UCS-2 and UCS-4 null-terminated string handling OOB read
- CWE-170->CWE-135->CWE-125: Improper Null Termination leads to Incorrect Calculation of Multi-Byte String Length leads to Out-of-bounds Read
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2019-20433
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authority (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications).
The following CVSS metrics and score provided are preliminary and subject to review.
Red Hat | NVD | |
---|---|---|
CVSS v3 Base Score | 5.8 | 9.1 |
Attack Vector | Local | Network |
Attack Complexity | High | Low |
Privileges Required | Low | None |
User Interaction | None | None |
Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
Confidentiality Impact | Low | High |
Integrity Impact | Low | None |
Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat: CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
NVD: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Red Hat CVSS v3 Score Explanation
This issue is a buffer over-read and it's likely to crash quickly, but could also potentially leak sensitive information or cause integrity problems. As this is a library, network access may technically be possible, but seems relatively far fetched. An attack vector of local nature seems more likely. Additionally, most applications explicitly set their encoding value, which prevents exploitation. Thus, access complexity has been set to high. In a lot of cases attackers would need to be able to change the "ASPELL_CONF" environment variable or aspell config file, so privileges required are set to low.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.
Want to get errata notifications? Sign up here.