CVE-2018-4700
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
[REJECTED CVE] A predictable session cookie vulnerability was identified in the CUPS printing server. Insufficient randomness in session cookie generation made it easy to guess, undermining CSRF protection. This flaw allowed unauthorized scripted access to the CUPS web interface when enabled, posing a risk of unauthorized control or configuration of the printing server.
Statement
This vulnerability was originally assigned CVE-2018-4700, but after the publication of security errata the identifier was changed to CVE-2018-4300. Both identifiers refer to the same vulnerability. Since some sources use CVE-2018-4700 and others use CVE-2018-4300, Red Hat security advisories for this vulnerability have been amended to include both identifiers.
Additional information
- Bugzilla 1649347: cups: Predictable session cookie breaks CSRF protection
- CWE-384: Session Fixation
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2018-4700
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authority (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications).
Red Hat | NVD | |
---|---|---|
CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.3 | N/A |
Attack Vector | Network | N/A |
Attack Complexity | Low | N/A |
Privileges Required | Low | N/A |
User Interaction | Required | N/A |
Scope | Unchanged | N/A |
Confidentiality Impact | High | N/A |
Integrity Impact | High | N/A |
Availability Impact | None | N/A |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.
Want to get errata notifications? Sign up here.