Skip to navigation

Warning message

log in to add comments or rate this document

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Cluster, High Availability, and GFS Deployment Best Practices

Updated 2014-02-17T18:01:55+00:00

Overview

This document describes best practices for deploying and upgrading Red Hat Enterprise Linux clusters using the High Availability Add-On and Red Hat Global File System (GFS/GFS2).

As clusters can be used in a wide range of both supported and unsupported scenarios to meet different business needs, this document describes certain exceptions and/or conditions that warrant a review by Red Hat to determine whether or not a cluster is supportable. An exception does not necessarily mean that a cluster is not supportable by Red Hat: while some exceptions result in unsupportable scenarios, others just need careful review and analysis before proceeding.

To obtain an architecture review, follow the instructions provided in What information is required for a Architecture Review of Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability and Resilient Storage?.

Environment

  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5+ with the High Availability Add On or Resilient Storage Add On
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6+ with the High Availability Add On or Resilient Storage Add On

Additional Support Links

These additional articles describe some of the below concepts in more detail. Please refer to them as needed:

Architecture Review Process Details:

General Architecture Support Articles:

Hardware Support Information:

Third Party Hardware/Software Integration:

Deployment Best Practices

This section describes best practices for cluster deployment using the Red Hat High Availability and Resilient Storage Add-Ons.

Choosing a Cluster Architecture

Red Hat Clustering is designed to run at a single physical site where latencies are expected to be LAN-like (under 2 msec). This remains the most recommended and rigorously tested configuration for running the Red Hat High Availability and Resilient Storage Add-Ons.

However, clusters are often used in different ways that require an architecture review by Red Hat. Two examples are multi-site clusters and stretch clusters. If you plan to deploy either, you must contact Red Hat prior to deployment to obtain support approval.

Multi-Site Clusters

Multi-site or disaster-tolerant clusters are separate clusters that run at different physical sites, typically using SAN-based storage replication to replicate data. Multi-site clusters are usually used in an active/passive manner for disaster recovery with manual failover of the active cluster to the passive cluster.

Stretch Clusters

Stretch clusters are single-cluster configurations that span multiple physical sites.

Additional details on the supportability of multi-site and stretch clusters can be found in Support for Red Hat Enterprise Linux Cluster and High Availability Stretch Architectures and please note that all stretch clusters require and an architecture review.

Selecting Cluster Node Hardware

The maximum number of cluster nodes supported by the High Availability Add-On is 16, and the same is true for the Resilient Storage Add-On which includes GFS2 and CLVM. For more information then please see the following article. However, the majority of Red Hat’s clustering customers use node counts much lower than the maximum. In general, if your cluster requires node counts higher than eight, it is advisable to verify your cluster architecture with Red Hat before deployment to confirm that it is supportable. Red Hat's clustering solution is primarily designed to provide high availability and cold application failover, and it is not meant to be used for either high-performance or load-sharing clusters.

Homogeneous hardware configurations (nodes with similar specifications in terms of CPU sockets, cores, memory, etc.) are recommended. If you require a heterogeneous cluster with nodes that have diverse hardware configurations (for example, if Node1 has four processors with 8 GB of RAM while Node2 has two processors with 2 GB of RAM), Red Hat recommends that you create an initial proof-of-concept cluster to ensure that you encounter no surprises during production. You may also submit your cluster architecture for review by Red Hat prior to deployment.

NOTE: Certain commercial hardware variants (servers and network switches) have known issues with multicast, which means that usage of GFS2 with a high volume of POSIX (fcntl) lock activity can result in performance and stability issues.

Selecting and Configuring Cluster Storage

There are no recommended best practices for selecting cluster storage hardware.

When using LVM in a cluster:

  • When using HA-LVM, if a synchronization is required (for example, after adding a leg to a mirror or restoring a failed mirror leg), it is recommended to disable the service utilizing that mirror.  If this is not possible, an administrator may freeze (clusvcadm -Z) the service in place to prevent failover while the mirror is rebuilding.  Once the mirror synchronization has completed, administrators must unfreeze (clusvcadm -U) the service. 
    • There are known issues if a service relocation occurs while synchronizing a mirror leg, notably bug #692186
    • If utilizing LVM mirroring and synchronization of a mirror is required while an application is utilizing the mirror, it is best practice to test this process on a non-production cluster with realistic application load to ensure that the application is not adversely impacted by the I/O performance drop caused by the mirror synchronization.

The presence or use of any of the following storage elements/features in your cluster mandates a review of your planned cluster deployment by Red Hat:

  • More than 50 filesystems or logical volumes mounted per node
  • Use of GFS or GFS2 
    • GFS and GFS2 are fully supported, but they are only suitable for certain environments and workloads; therefore, it is best to consult with Red Hat about your architecture and intended use of GFS file systems before proceeding
  • Lock-intensive workloads
  • Using GFS/GFS2 as a cost-effective replacement for an enterprise-class NFS filer product

  • Multipath storage 

    • Review timeout values
    • Use of multipath and qdiskd together (prior to RHEL 6.3)
  • Mixing storage and network traffic on the same physical network (for example, cluster infrastructure/heartbeat/locking on same network as iSCSI remote storage)
  • Storage replication on commercial hardware

  • Cluster Mirroring (cmirror)

Setting Up Cluster Networks

It is highly recommended to separate the private network for cluster heartbeat from the application network. This should be done wherever possible.

Red Hat Clustering only supports the use of a redundant ring that provides additional resilience when the cluster heartbeat network fails on RHEL 6.4+ only.

Red Hat Clustering recommends that NIC bonding is used to work around a network failure issue. Bonding is used primarily to ensure high availability of the cluster heartbeat, but it also usually introduces additional complexity. In such cases, Red Hat recommends a review of the cluster’s network configuration. For RHEL versions 4, 5, and 6.0-6.3, the only supported bonding mode is mode=1, which is also known as the active/passive mode. In RHEL 6.4+ bonding modes 0, 1, and 2 are supported. For additional details see this article: What are the supported bonding modes for Red Hat Clustering?.

Network infrastructure used for the cluster heartbeat network must be switched and should be configured to eliminate single points of failure that could lead to split-brain situations (for example, it would not be recommended to have four nodes on Switch A and four nodes on Switch B with only a single interconnect between Switch A and Switch B). In addition, Red Hat does not support the use of crossover cables for the cluster heartbeat network between nodes in a two-node cluster.

Red Hat Clustering in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 and the High Availability Add-On in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 use multicasting for cluster membership. If multicasting cannot be enabled in your production network, broadcast may be considered as an alternative in RHEL 5.6+. In RHEL 6 you must contact Red Hat to discuss alternate networking options before proceeding with deployment.

Using Quorum Disk and Tweaking Cluster Membership Timers

The use of qdiskd with Red Hat Clustering is optional in most cases. The exception is a configuration with a two-node cluster where the fence devices are on a separate network from the cluster heartbeat network, requiring a quorum disk to prevent split-brain situations from causing a fence race. This configuration mandates a review by Red Hat.

The use of qdiskd for clusters with more than four nodes is not recommended as it adds additional complexity with very little benefit. Because it is highly unlikely that more than 50% of the nodes will fail in a cluster that has more than four nodes at the same time, users are advised against using qdiskd in such situations. If you have an absolute need to use qdiskd for clusters with more than four nodes, your cluster architecture must be reviewed so that Red Hat can confirm and approve the use of a quorum disk.

While using qdiskd, if you need to use custom quorum-disk heuristics (as opposed to the stock heuristics), you should submit your architecture for review by Red Hat.
Red Hat does not recommend changing the default timer values associated with cluster membership as changing them could have a cascading impact on other timers and overall cluster behavior. If you need to tweak any of the cluster membership timer values (for example, token and consensus timeout), you must obtain Red Hat's approval before deploying your cluster for production.

Using Highly Available Resources

Red Hat Clustering works best with resources in an active/passive mode, requiring a cold failover or a restart if the current active application instance fails. Use of Red Hat Clustering or the Red Hat High Availability Add-On is not advisable for applications running in an active/active load-sharing mode.

Supported file-system resources are as follows:

  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5: ext3, XFS (RHEL 5.7+), GFS and GFS2
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6: ext3, ext4, XFS (RHEL 6.2+), GFS2

Contact Red Hat to obtain an approval if your cluster requires any of the following types of resources:

  • NFS on top of GFS/GFS2
  • Active/active (load balancing) resource configurations
  • Usage of third-party software resource agents that ship with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (SAP, Sybase ASE, Oracle 10g/11g)
  • Usage of DRBD (Please see article Does RHEL-6 support DRBD?)
  • Custom resource agents that are not shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux
    • NOTE: Custom resource agents are allowed, but only the resource agents shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux are fully supported by Red Hat. Use of the script resource agent on an LSB-compliant init script does not require additional review.

Using GFS and GFS2

Please refer to the following article for detailed GFS and GFS2 best practices: How do I debug a GFS/GFS2 performance problem?

Miscellaneous

The following miscellaneous features/scenarios also warrant a review of your cluster configuration by Red Hat:

  • Oracle RAC + GFS deployments on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5

  • Running Red Hat High Availability Add-On software inside of virtual machines on Xen (only supported on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 hosts and guests)

  • Bare-metal clusters managing highly available virtual machines where a one- or two-node failure would cause overcommit of either RAM or CPU on the remaining machines

Unsupported Items

The following features/scenarios will result in an unsupported cluster deployment.

Items marked for Technology Preview indicate that while the item is presently unsupported, Red Hat is working to fully support the feature in a future release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Each of these items applies to both Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 deployments, except where specifically noted:

  • Overall architecture 
    • Oracle RAC on GFS2 is unsupported
    • Staged/rolling upgrades between any major release is not supported. For example, a rolling upgrade of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.
  • Hardware
    • Cluster node count greater than 16 is unsupported
  • Storage
    • Usage of MD RAID for cluster storage is unsupported
    • Snapshotting of clustered logical volumes is unsupported unless that volume has been activated exclusively on one node (as of release lvm2-2.02.84-1.el5 in RHEL 5.7 or lvm2-2.02.83-3.el6 in RHEL 6.1)
    • Using multiple SAN devices to mirror GFS/GFS2 or clustered logical volumes across different subsets of the cluster nodes is unsupported
  • Networking
  • High Availability Resources
    • Usage of NFS in an active/active configuration on top of either GFS or GFS2 is unsupported
    • Usage of NFS and Samba on top of same GFS/GFS2 instance is unsupported
  • Running Red Hat High Availability Add-On or clusters on virtualized guests his limited support. For details see the following article: Virtualization Support for High Availability in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 and 6