Do I need to set different broker name in master/slave brokers?

Solution Unverified - Updated -

Issue

My brokers are master/slave topology and they are using NFSV4 as shared storage. I want to know whether it is a must to set different broker name for the master and slave broker.

<broker ... >
  ...
  <persistenceAdapter>
    <kahaDB directory="/sharedFileSystem/sharedBrokerData" 
lockKeepAlivePeriod="2000">
        <locker>
            <shared-file-locker lockAcquireSleepInterval="10000" />
        </locker>
     </kahaDB>
  </persistenceAdapter>
  ...
</broker>

Environment

  • Red Hat JBoss AMQ 6.X

Subscriber exclusive content

A Red Hat subscription provides unlimited access to our knowledgebase of over 48,000 articles and solutions.

Current Customers and Partners

Log in for full access

Log In
Close

Welcome! Check out the Getting Started with Red Hat page for quick tours and guides for common tasks.