Websphere MQ vs Active-MQ

Solution Verified - Updated -

Issue

  • We recently found a white paper that compares IBM Websphere MQ 7.5 and Apache ActiveMQ 5.9 developed by the Edison Group in collaboration with IBM http://whywebsphere.com/2014/05/30/wmqvsamq/ .
    The report questions the failover capability of ActiveMQ. They experienced loss of messages in a network failure scenario but concluded this way: "ActiveMQ lost or duplicated messages during “power outage” and “network failure” scenarios.
    What is Red Hat's opinion/feedback on this report and specially on the "network disruption" case?

  • Does Red Hat have any response to the paper this white paper http://theedison.com/pdf/Edison_IBM_WebSphere_MQ_vs_ActiveMQ_White_Paper.pdf comparing Websphere-MQ to Active-MQ

Environment

Red Hat JBoss A-MQ

Subscriber exclusive content

A Red Hat subscription provides unlimited access to our knowledgebase of over 48,000 articles and solutions.

Current Customers and Partners

Log in for full access

Log In