Websphere MQ vs Active-MQ

Solution Verified - Updated -


  • We recently found a white paper that compares IBM Websphere MQ 7.5 and Apache ActiveMQ 5.9 developed by the Edison Group in collaboration with IBM http://whywebsphere.com/2014/05/30/wmqvsamq/ .
    The report questions the failover capability of ActiveMQ. They experienced loss of messages in a network failure scenario but concluded this way: "ActiveMQ lost or duplicated messages during “power outage” and “network failure” scenarios.
    What is Red Hat's opinion/feedback on this report and specially on the "network disruption" case?

  • Does Red Hat have any response to the paper this white paper http://theedison.com/pdf/Edison_IBM_WebSphere_MQ_vs_ActiveMQ_White_Paper.pdf comparing Websphere-MQ to Active-MQ


Red Hat JBoss A-MQ

Subscriber exclusive content

A Red Hat subscription provides unlimited access to our knowledgebase, tools, and much more.

Current Customers and Partners

Log in for full access

Log In

New to Red Hat?

Learn more about Red Hat subscriptions

Using a Red Hat product through a public cloud?

How to access this content