Do I need to set different broker name in master/slave brokers?
Issue
My brokers are master/slave topology and they are using NFSV4 as shared storage. I want to know whether it is a must to set different broker name for the master and slave broker.
<broker ... >
...
<persistenceAdapter>
<kahaDB directory="/sharedFileSystem/sharedBrokerData"
lockKeepAlivePeriod="2000">
<locker>
<shared-file-locker lockAcquireSleepInterval="10000" />
</locker>
</kahaDB>
</persistenceAdapter>
...
</broker>
Environment
- Red Hat JBoss AMQ 6.X
Subscriber exclusive content
A Red Hat subscription provides unlimited access to our knowledgebase, tools, and much more.