-
Language:
English
-
Language:
English
Red Hat Training
A Red Hat training course is available for Red Hat JBoss Web Server
1.4. Mapping Associations
1.4.1. About Mapping Associations
So far we have mapped a single persistent entity class to a table in isolation. Let's expand on that a bit and add some class associations. We will add people to the application and store a list of events in which they participate.
1.4.2. Mapping the Person Class
The first cut of the
Person class looks like this:
package org.hibernate.tutorial.domain;
public class Person {
private Long id;
private int age;
private String firstname;
private String lastname;
public Person() {}
// Accessor methods for all properties, private setter for 'id'
}
Save this to a file named
src/main/java/org/hibernate/tutorial/domain/Person.java
Next, create the new mapping file as
src/main/resources/org/hibernate/tutorial/domain/Person.hbm.xml
<hibernate-mapping package="org.hibernate.tutorial.domain">
<class name="Person" table="PERSON">
<id name="id" column="PERSON_ID">
<generator class="native"/>
</id>
<property name="age"/>
<property name="firstname"/>
<property name="lastname"/>
</class>
</hibernate-mapping>
Finally, add the new mapping to Hibernate's configuration immediately after the existing mapping for
Event.hbm.xml:
<mapping resource="events/Event.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="events/Person.hbm.xml"/>
Create an association between these two entities. Persons can participate in events, and events have participants. The design questions you have to deal with are: directionality, multiplicity, and collection behavior.
1.4.3. A Unidirectional Set-based Association
By adding a collection of events to the
Person class, you can easily navigate to the events for a particular person, without executing an explicit query - by calling Person#getEvents. Multi-valued associations are represented in Hibernate by one of the Java Collection Framework contracts; here we choose a java.util.Set because the collection will not contain duplicate elements and the ordering is not relevant to our examples:
import java.util.Set;
public class Person {
private Set events = new HashSet();
public Set getEvents() {
return events;
}
public void setEvents(Set events) {
this.events = events;
}
}
Before mapping this association, let's consider the other side. We could just keep this unidirectional or create another collection on the
Event, if we wanted to be able to navigate it from both directions. This is not necessary, from a functional perspective. You can always execute an explicit query to retrieve the participants for a particular event. This is a design choice left to you, but what is clear from this discussion is the multiplicity of the association: "many" valued on both sides is called a many-to-many association. Hence, we use Hibernate's many-to-many mapping:
<class name="Person" table="PERSON">
<id name="id" column="PERSON_ID">
<generator class="native"/>
</id>
<property name="age"/>
<property name="firstname"/>
<property name="lastname"/>
<set name="events" table="PERSON_EVENT">
<key column="PERSON_ID"/>
<many-to-many column="EVENT_ID" class="Event"/>
</set>
</class>
Hibernate supports a broad range of collection mappings, a
set being most common. For a many-to-many association, or n:m entity relationship, an association table is required. Each row in this table represents a link between a person and an event. The table name is decalred using the table attribute of the set element. The identifier column name in the association, for the person side, is defined with the key element, the column name for the event's side with the column attribute of the many-to-many. You also have to tell Hibernate the class of the objects in your collection (the class on the other side of the collection of references).
The database schema for this mapping is therefore:
_____________ __________________
| | | | _____________
| EVENTS | | PERSON_EVENT | | |
|_____________| |__________________| | PERSON |
| | | | |_____________|
| *EVENT_ID | <--> | *EVENT_ID | | |
| EVENT_DATE | | *PERSON_ID | <--> | *PERSON_ID |
| TITLE | |__________________| | AGE |
|_____________| | FIRSTNAME |
| LASTNAME |
|_____________|
1.4.4. Working the Association
Now we will bring some people and events together in a new method in
EventManager:
private void addPersonToEvent(Long personId, Long eventId) {
Session session = HibernateUtil.getSessionFactory().getCurrentSession();
session.beginTransaction();
Person aPerson = (Person) session.load(Person.class, personId);
Event anEvent = (Event) session.load(Event.class, eventId);
aPerson.getEvents().add(anEvent);
session.getTransaction().commit();
}
After loading a
Person and an Event, simply modify the collection using the normal collection methods. There is no explicit call to update() or save(); Hibernate automatically detects that the collection has been modified and needs to be updated. This is called automatic dirty checking. You can also try it by modifying the name or the date property of any of your objects. As long as they are in persistent state, that is, bound to a particular Hibernate org.hibernate.Session, Hibernate monitors any changes and executes SQL in a write-behind fashion. The process of synchronizing the memory state with the database, usually only at the end of a unit of work, is called flushing. In our code, the unit of work ends with a commit, or rollback, of the database transaction.
You can load person and event in different units of work. Or you can modify an object outside of a
org.hibernate.Session, when it is not in persistent state (if it was persistent before, this state is called detached). You can even modify a collection when it is detached:
private void addPersonToEvent(Long personId, Long eventId) {
Session session = HibernateUtil.getSessionFactory().getCurrentSession();
session.beginTransaction();
Person aPerson = (Person) session
.createQuery("select p from Person p left join fetch p.events where p.id = :pid")
.setParameter("pid", personId)
.uniqueResult(); // Eager fetch the collection so we can use it detached
Event anEvent = (Event) session.load(Event.class, eventId);
session.getTransaction().commit();
// End of first unit of work
aPerson.getEvents().add(anEvent); // aPerson (and its collection) is detached
// Begin second unit of work
Session session2 = HibernateUtil.getSessionFactory().getCurrentSession();
session2.beginTransaction();
session2.update(aPerson); // Reattachment of aPerson
session2.getTransaction().commit();
}
The call to
update makes a detached object persistent again by binding it to a new unit of work, so any modifications you made to it while detached can be saved to the database. This includes any modifications (additions/deletions) you made to a collection of that entity object.
This is not much use in our example, but it is an important concept you can incorporate into your own application. Complete this exercise by adding a new action to the main method of the
EventManager and call it from the command line. If you need the identifiers of a person and an event - the save() method returns it (you might have to modify some of the previous methods to return that identifier):
else if (args[0].equals("addpersontoevent")) {
Long eventId = mgr.createAndStoreEvent("My Event", new Date());
Long personId = mgr.createAndStorePerson("Foo", "Bar");
mgr.addPersonToEvent(personId, eventId);
System.out.println("Added person " + personId + " to event " + eventId);
}
This is an example of an association between two equally important classes : two entities. As mentioned earlier, there are other classes and types in a typical model, usually "less important". Some you have already seen, like an
int or a java.lang.String. We call these classes value types, and their instances depend on a particular entity. Instances of these types do not have their own identity, nor are they shared between entities. Two persons do not reference the same firstname object, even if they have the same first name. Value types cannot only be found in the JDK , but you can also write dependent classes yourself such as an Address or MonetaryAmount class. In fact, in a Hibernate application all JDK classes are considered value types.
You can also design a collection of value types. This is conceptually different from a collection of references to other entities, but looks almost the same in Java.
1.4.5. Collection of Values
Let's add a collection of email addresses to the
Person entity. This will be represented as a java.util.Set of java.lang.String instances:
private Set emailAddresses = new HashSet();
public Set getEmailAddresses() {
return emailAddresses;
}
public void setEmailAddresses(Set emailAddresses) {
this.emailAddresses = emailAddresses;
}
The mapping of this
Set is as follows:
<set name="emailAddresses" table="PERSON_EMAIL_ADDR">
<key column="PERSON_ID"/>
<element type="string" column="EMAIL_ADDR"/>
</set>
The difference compared with the earlier mapping is the use of the
element part which tells Hibernate that the collection does not contain references to another entity, but is rather a collection whose elements are values types, here specifically of type string. The lowercase name tells you it is a Hibernate mapping type/converter. Again the table attribute of the set element determines the table name for the collection. The key element defines the foreign-key column name in the collection table. The column attribute in the element element defines the column name where the email address values will actually be stored.
Here is the updated schema:
_____________ __________________
| | | | _____________
| EVENTS | | PERSON_EVENT | | | ___________________
|_____________| |__________________| | PERSON | | |
| | | | |_____________| | PERSON_EMAIL_ADDR |
| *EVENT_ID | <--> | *EVENT_ID | | | |___________________|
| EVENT_DATE | | *PERSON_ID | <--> | *PERSON_ID | <--> | *PERSON_ID |
| TITLE | |__________________| | AGE | | *EMAIL_ADDR |
|_____________| | FIRSTNAME | |___________________|
| LASTNAME |
|_____________|
You can see that the primary key of the collection table is in fact a composite key that uses both columns. This also implies that there cannot be duplicate email addresses per person, which is exactly the semantics we need for a set in Java.
You can now try to add elements to this collection, just like we did before by linking persons and events. It is the same code in Java:
private void addEmailToPerson(Long personId, String emailAddress) {
Session session = HibernateUtil.getSessionFactory().getCurrentSession();
session.beginTransaction();
Person aPerson = (Person) session.load(Person.class, personId);
// adding to the emailAddress collection might trigger a lazy load of the collection
aPerson.getEmailAddresses().add(emailAddress);
session.getTransaction().commit();
}
This time we did not use a fetch query to initialize the collection. Monitor the SQL log and try to optimize this with an eager fetch.
1.4.6. Bi-directional Associations
Next you will map a bi-directional association. You will make the association between person and event work from both sides in Java. The database schema does not change, so you will still have many-to-many multiplicity.
Note
A relational database is more flexible than a network programming language, in that it does not need a navigation direction; data can be viewed and retrieved in any possible way.
First, add a collection of participants to the
Event class:
private Set participants = new HashSet();
public Set getParticipants() {
return participants;
}
public void setParticipants(Set participants) {
this.participants = participants;
}
Now map this side of the association in
Event.hbm.xml.
<set name="participants" table="PERSON_EVENT" inverse="true"> <key column="EVENT_ID"/> <many-to-many column="PERSON_ID" class="org.hibernate.tutorial.domain.Person"/> </set>
These are normal
set mappings in both mapping documents. Notice that the column names in key and many-to-many swap in both mapping documents. The most important addition here is the inverse="true" attribute in the set element of the Event's collection mapping.
What this means is that Hibernate should take the other side, the
Person class, when it needs to find out information about the link between the two. This will be a lot easier to understand once you see how the bi-directional link between our two entities is created.
1.4.7. Working Bi-directional Links
First, keep in mind that Hibernate does not affect normal Java semantics. How did we create a link between a
Person and an Event in the unidirectional example? You add an instance of Event to the collection of event references, of an instance of Person. If you want to make this link bi-directional, you have to do the same on the other side by adding a Person reference to the collection in an Event. This process of "setting the link on both sides" is absolutely necessary with bi-directional links.
Many developers program defensively and create link management methods to correctly set both sides (for example, in
Person):
protected Set getEvents() {
return events;
}
protected void setEvents(Set events) {
this.events = events;
}
public void addToEvent(Event event) {
this.getEvents().add(event);
event.getParticipants().add(this);
}
public void removeFromEvent(Event event) {
this.getEvents().remove(event);
event.getParticipants().remove(this);
}
The get and set methods for the collection are now protected. This allows classes in the same package and subclasses to still access the methods, but prevents everybody else from altering the collections directly. Repeat the steps for the collection on the other side.
What about the
inverse mapping attribute? For you, and for Java, a bi-directional link is simply a matter of setting the references on both sides correctly. Hibernate, however, does not have enough information to correctly arrange SQL INSERT and UPDATE statements (to avoid constraint violations). Making one side of the association inverse tells Hibernate to consider it a mirror of the other side. That is all that is necessary for Hibernate to resolve any issues that arise when transforming a directional navigation model to a SQL database schema. The rules are straightforward: all bi-directional associations need one side as inverse. In a one-to-many association it has to be the many-side, and in many-to-many association you can select either side.
