g-io-error-quark, 39

Latest response

Running into an "interesting" issue with AMI generation in AWS. We have a set of layered automations (AMIgenerator and spel) we use for generating AMIs. We generate "day-to-day" and "recovery" AMIs for both RHEL and CentOS 7 (both tools are used for creating the day-to-days and just the AMIgenerator for the recovery AMIs).

Our "day-to-day" AMIs are fine across regions for both RHEL/CentOS. Our "recovery" AMIs are also fine across regions for CentOS but not RHEL 7. Specifically, when trying to run systemctl daemon-reexec (used by spel when generating "day-to-day" AMIs from the "recovery" AMIs), the action fails with the error

Error getting authority: Error initializing authority: Could not connect: Connection refused (g-io-error-quark, 39).

Googling around there's a definite paucity of hits on the g-io-error-quark and no hits when you look for the 39 sub-code. Near as I can surmise, systemd is either dead(??) or is sufficiently jacked-up that it's refusing to listen for control messages. However, that's as much as I can surmise.

Also, as noted previously, this only happens for Red Hat but not CentOS and only happens in the context of attempting to pivot-root with the recovery AMI. On the face, the recovery AMI seems to function about as one would normally expect.

Responses

Any new information I get the same

Negative. Up until the 7.4 to 7.5 update-cycle, it was mostly just an academic "that's weird" message we'd sometimes encounter during AMI-generation. However, since the release of RHEL 7.5, DBUS becomes straight-up unusable when trying to do an ungoverned yum update against an instance launched from our pre-7.5 AMIs. Ended up having to open a BugZilla because of it.

For now, we're having to tell AMI users, "either re-deploy your service using a 7.5 AMI or configure yum to not upgrade DBUS or the DBUS libs".

Noticed the email-notification of your query when I opened my mail client to ping our account-managers about the issue. Was hoping to get additional attention paid to that bug - since the response has, thus far, been kind of slow.

This is happening after updating an oracle RAC from 7.4 to 7.5.

Is there a solution for this error yet?

Close

Welcome! Check out the Getting Started with Red Hat page for quick tours and guides for common tasks.