[RGW] implications when using rgw_relaxed_s3_bucket_names

Solution Verified - Updated -

Issue

We'd like to use bucket names that are longer than 63 characters. Can we just set rgw_relaxed_s3_bucket_names to true, or are there any implications?

Environment

  • Red Hat Ceph Storage
  • RGW Object Gateway

Subscriber exclusive content

A Red Hat subscription provides unlimited access to our knowledgebase, tools, and much more.

Current Customers and Partners

Log in for full access

Log In

New to Red Hat?

Learn more about Red Hat subscriptions

Using a Red Hat product through a public cloud?

How to access this content