<Vulnerability name="CVE-2026-6949">
    <DocumentDistribution xml:lang="en">Copyright © 2012 Red Hat, Inc. All rights reserved.</DocumentDistribution>
    <ThreatSeverity>Important</ThreatSeverity>
    <PublicDate>2026-07-28T10:00:00</PublicDate>
    <Bugzilla id="2502730" url="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2502730" xml:lang="en:us">
samba: TSIG packet with crafted name compression can crash DNS server
    </Bugzilla>
    <CVSS3 status="draft">
        <CVSS3BaseScore>7.5</CVSS3BaseScore>
        <CVSS3ScoringVector>CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</CVSS3ScoringVector>
    </CVSS3>
    <CWE>CWE-787</CWE>
    <Details xml:lang="en:us" source="Red Hat">
A flaw was found in Samba's internal DNS server when processing TSIG-signed DNS packets containing compressed names. Incorrect size calculations while determining the portion of the DNS packet covered by the TSIG signature can result in an integer underflow, leading to an out-of-bounds memory write during packet processing. A remote attacker can send a specially crafted TSIG-signed DNS packet to cause the DNS server to terminate unexpectedly.
    </Details>
    <Statement xml:lang="en:us">
Red Hat Product Security evaluates this vulnerability as having an Important impact for Samba deployments operating as an Active Directory Domain Controller (AD DC) using the internal DNS server engine.

```
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Context: Default installations of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) are not affected. RHEL does not ship or support the Samba Active Directory Domain Controller (AD DC) role or its internal DNS server component where this vulnerability resides.

```


```
Additionally, Samba AD DC deployments that use the external BIND9 DLZ plugin instead of the internal DNS server engine are completely unaffected by this issue.

```
    </Statement>
    <Acknowledgement xml:lang="en:us">
Red Hat would like to thank Arjun Basnet (Securin Labs) for reporting this issue.
    </Acknowledgement>
    <PackageState cpe="cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10">
        <ProductName>Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10</ProductName>
        <FixState>Not affected</FixState>
        <PackageName>samba</PackageName>
    </PackageState>
    <PackageState cpe="cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:6">
        <ProductName>Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6</ProductName>
        <FixState>Not affected</FixState>
        <PackageName>samba</PackageName>
    </PackageState>
    <PackageState cpe="cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:6">
        <ProductName>Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6</ProductName>
        <FixState>Not affected</FixState>
        <PackageName>samba4</PackageName>
    </PackageState>
    <PackageState cpe="cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7">
        <ProductName>Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7</ProductName>
        <FixState>Not affected</FixState>
        <PackageName>samba</PackageName>
    </PackageState>
    <PackageState cpe="cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8">
        <ProductName>Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8</ProductName>
        <FixState>Not affected</FixState>
        <PackageName>samba</PackageName>
    </PackageState>
    <PackageState cpe="cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9">
        <ProductName>Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9</ProductName>
        <FixState>Not affected</FixState>
        <PackageName>samba</PackageName>
    </PackageState>
    <PackageState cpe="cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4">
        <ProductName>Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4</ProductName>
        <FixState>Not affected</FixState>
        <PackageName>rhcos</PackageName>
    </PackageState>
    <References xml:lang="en:us">
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-6949
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-6949
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16083
https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2026-6949.html
    </References>
</Vulnerability>