<Vulnerability name="CVE-2026-53038">
    <DocumentDistribution xml:lang="en">Copyright © 2012 Red Hat, Inc. All rights reserved.</DocumentDistribution>
    <ThreatSeverity>Moderate</ThreatSeverity>
    <PublicDate>2026-06-24T00:00:00</PublicDate>
    <Bugzilla id="2492386" url="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2492386" xml:lang="en:us">
kernel: ima_fs: Correctly create securityfs files for unsupported hash algos
    </Bugzilla>
    <CVSS3 status="draft">
        <CVSS3BaseScore>5.5</CVSS3BaseScore>
        <CVSS3ScoringVector>CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</CVSS3ScoringVector>
    </CVSS3>
    <CWE>CWE-125</CWE>
    <Details xml:lang="en:us" source="Mitre">
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ima_fs: Correctly create securityfs files for unsupported hash algos

ima_tpm_chip-&gt;allocated_banks[i].crypto_id is initialized to
HASH_ALGO__LAST if the TPM algorithm is not supported. However there
are places relying on the algorithm to be valid because it is accessed
by hash_algo_name[].

On 6.12.40 I observe the following read out-of-bounds in hash_algo_name:
  ==================================================================
  BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in create_securityfs_measurement_lists+0x396/0x440
  Read of size 8 at addr ffffffff83e18138 by task swapper/0/1

  CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.12.40 #3
  Call Trace:
   &lt;TASK&gt;
   dump_stack_lvl+0x61/0x90
   print_report+0xc4/0x580
   ? kasan_addr_to_slab+0x26/0x80
   ? create_securityfs_measurement_lists+0x396/0x440
   kasan_report+0xc2/0x100
   ? create_securityfs_measurement_lists+0x396/0x440
   create_securityfs_measurement_lists+0x396/0x440
   ima_fs_init+0xa3/0x300
   ima_init+0x7d/0xd0
   init_ima+0x28/0x100
   do_one_initcall+0xa6/0x3e0
   kernel_init_freeable+0x455/0x740
   kernel_init+0x24/0x1d0
   ret_from_fork+0x38/0x80
   ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
   &lt;/TASK&gt;

  The buggy address belongs to the variable:
   hash_algo_name+0xb8/0x420

  Memory state around the buggy address:
   ffffffff83e18000: 00 01 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 01 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9
   ffffffff83e18080: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  &gt;ffffffff83e18100: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 05 f9 f9
                                          ^
   ffffffff83e18180: f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 f9 f9 f9 f9
   ffffffff83e18200: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9
  ==================================================================

Seems like the TPM chip supports sha3_256, which isn't yet in
tpm_algorithms:
  tpm tpm0: TPM with unsupported bank algorithm 0x0027

That's TPM_ALG_SHA3_256 == 0x0027 from "Trusted Platform Module 2.0
Library Part 2: Structures", page 51 [1].
See also the related U-Boot algorithms update [2].

Thus solve the problem by creating a file name with "_tpm_alg_&lt;ID&gt;"
postfix if the crypto algorithm isn't initialized.

This is how it looks on the test machine (patch ported to v6.12 release):
  # ls -1 /sys/kernel/security/ima/
  ascii_runtime_measurements
  ascii_runtime_measurements_tpm_alg_27
  ascii_runtime_measurements_sha1
  ascii_runtime_measurements_sha256
  binary_runtime_measurements
  binary_runtime_measurements_tpm_alg_27
  binary_runtime_measurements_sha1
  binary_runtime_measurements_sha256
  policy
  runtime_measurements_count
  violations

[1]: https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/Trusted-Platform-Module-2.0-Library-Part-2-Version-184_pub.pdf
[2]: https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2024-July/558835.html
    </Details>
    <Details xml:lang="en:us" source="Red Hat">
A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's Integrity Measurement Architecture (IMA) subsystem. When handling unsupported Trusted Platform Module (TPM) hash algorithms, the `ima_fs` component incorrectly accesses a hash algorithm name array, leading to a read out-of-bounds. This vulnerability could allow a local attacker to cause a system crash, resulting in a denial of service.
    </Details>
    <PackageState cpe="cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10">
        <ProductName>Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10</ProductName>
        <FixState>Fix deferred</FixState>
        <PackageName>kernel</PackageName>
    </PackageState>
    <PackageState cpe="cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:6">
        <ProductName>Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6</ProductName>
        <FixState>Not affected</FixState>
        <PackageName>kernel</PackageName>
    </PackageState>
    <PackageState cpe="cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7">
        <ProductName>Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7</ProductName>
        <FixState>Not affected</FixState>
        <PackageName>kernel</PackageName>
    </PackageState>
    <PackageState cpe="cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7">
        <ProductName>Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7</ProductName>
        <FixState>Not affected</FixState>
        <PackageName>kernel-rt</PackageName>
    </PackageState>
    <PackageState cpe="cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8">
        <ProductName>Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8</ProductName>
        <FixState>Not affected</FixState>
        <PackageName>kernel</PackageName>
    </PackageState>
    <PackageState cpe="cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8">
        <ProductName>Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8</ProductName>
        <FixState>Not affected</FixState>
        <PackageName>kernel-rt</PackageName>
    </PackageState>
    <PackageState cpe="cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9">
        <ProductName>Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9</ProductName>
        <FixState>Not affected</FixState>
        <PackageName>kernel</PackageName>
    </PackageState>
    <PackageState cpe="cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9">
        <ProductName>Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9</ProductName>
        <FixState>Not affected</FixState>
        <PackageName>kernel-rt</PackageName>
    </PackageState>
    <References xml:lang="en:us">
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53038
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53038
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2026062456-CVE-2026-53038-345d@gregkh/T
    </References>
</Vulnerability>