Show Table of Contents
1.3. SwitchYard Security Configuration
All services within a domain share the same security configuration, which is specified in
META-INF/switchyard.xml:
<switchyard>
<domain>
<security callbackHandler="callback-handler-class-name" moduleName="jaas-domain-name" rolesAllowed="users, administrators" runAs="leaders">
<properties>
<property name="property-name" value="property-value"/>
</properties>
</security>
</domain>
</switchyard>
- The <security> element
- This is an optional element. If not specified, the callbackHandler and moduleName attributes described below will fallback to their default values.
- The callbackHandler attribute
- This is an optional attribute. If not specified, a default value of
org.switchyard.security.callback.NamePasswordCallbackHandlerwill be used. - The moduleName attribute
- This is an optional attribute. If not specified, a default value of other will be used. The value maps to a JAAS security domain name.
- The rolesAllowed attribute
- This is an optional attribute. If specified, and if a Service has an authorization security policy requirement, the authenticated user must be in one of the roles listed. The value is a comma-separated list of roles (whitespace gets trimmed).
- The runAs attribute
- This is an optional attribute. If specified, the value of this attribute will be added as a role to the authenticated user.
- The <properties> and <property> elements
- A <security> element can optionally specify a <properties> element. This can be adjusted to specify zero to many (0..*) <property> elements. Each <property> element requires a name and a value attribute.
Note
The list of specified name/value properties is made available to the SwitchYard Security configuration, as well as the configured callbackHandler. Some CallbackHandlers require configuration information beyond what can be assumed in a no-argument constructor. See the individual CallbackHandler implementations for details.

Where did the comment section go?
Red Hat's documentation publication system recently went through an upgrade to enable speedier, more mobile-friendly content. We decided to re-evaluate our commenting platform to ensure that it meets your expectations and serves as an optimal feedback mechanism. During this redesign, we invite your input on providing feedback on Red Hat documentation via the discussion platform.