15.2. POSIX Clocks
CLOCK_REALTIME: it represents the time in the real world, also referred to as 'wall time' meaning the time as read from the clock on the wall. This clock is used to timestamp events, and when interfacing with the user. It can be modified by an user with the right privileges. However, user modification should be used with caution as it can lead to erroneous data if the clock has its value changed between two readings.CLOCK_MONOTONIC: represents the time monotonically increased since the system boot. This clock cannot be set by any process, and is the preferred clock for calculating the time difference between events. The following examples in this section useCLOCK_MONOTONICas the POSIX clock.
Note
- clock_gettime()
- Linux System Programming by Robert Love
clock_gettime(), which is defined at <time.h>. The clock_gettime() command takes two parameters: the POSIX clock ID and a timespec structure which will be filled with the duration used to read the clock. The following example shows the function to measure the cost of reading the clock:
Example 15.2. Using clock_gettime() to Measure the Cost of Reading POSIX Clocks
#include <time.h>
main()
{
int rc;
long i;
struct timespec ts;
for(i=0; i<10000000; i++) {
rc = clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &ts);
}
}
clock_gettime(), to verify the value of the rc variable, or to ensure the content of the ts structure is to be trusted. The clock_gettime() manpage provides more information to help you write more reliable applications.
Important
clock_gettime() function must be linked with the rt library by adding '-lrt' to the gcc command line:
~]$ gcc clock_timing.c -o clock_timing -lrt
15.2.1. CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE and CLOCK_REALTIME_COARSE
clock_gettime() and gettimeofday() have a counterpart in the kernel, in the form of a system call. When a user process calls clock_gettime(), the corresponding C library (glibc) routine calls the sys_clock_gettime() system call, which performs the requested operation and then returns the result to the user process.
CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE and CLOCK_REALTIME_COARSE POSIX clocks was created in the form of a VDSO library function. The _COARSE variants are faster to read and have a precision (also known as resolution) of one millisecond (ms).
15.2.2. Using clock_getres() to Compare Clock Resolution
clock_getres() function you can check the resolution of a given POSIX clock. clock_getres() uses the same two parameters as clock_gettime(): the ID of the POSIX clock to be used, and a pointer to the timespec structure where the result is returned. The following function enables you to compare the precision between CLOCK_MONOTONIC and CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE:
main()
{
int rc;
struct timespec res;
rc = clock_getres(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &res);
if (!rc)
printf("CLOCK_MONOTONIC: %ldns\n", res.tv_nsec);
rc = clock_getres(CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE, &res);
if (!rc)
printf("CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE: %ldns\n", res.tv_nsec);
}
Example 15.3. Sample Output of clock_getres
TSC: ~]#./clock_resolutionCLOCK_MONOTONIC: 1ns CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE: 999848ns (about 1ms) HPET: ~]#./clock_resolutionCLOCK_MONOTONIC: 1ns CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE: 999848ns (about 1ms) ACPI_PM: ~]#./clock_resolutionCLOCK_MONOTONIC: 1ns CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE: 999848ns (about 1ms)
15.2.3. Using C Code to Compare Clock Resolution
CLOCK_MONOTONIC POSIX clock. All nine digits in the tv_nsec field of the timespec structure are meaningful as the clock has a nanosecond resolution. The example function, named clock_test.c, is as follows:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <time.h>
main()
{
int i;
struct timespec ts;
for(i=0; i<5; i++) {
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &ts);
printf("%ld.%ld\n", ts.tv_sec, ts.tv_nsec);
usleep(200);
}
}
Example 15.4. Sample Output of clock_test.c and clock_test_coarse.c
~]#gcc clock_test.c -o clock_test -lrt~]#./clock_test218449.986980853 218449.987330908 218449.987590716 218449.987849549 218449.988108248
clock_test_coarse.c and replacing CLOCK_MONOTONIC with CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE, the result would look something like:
~]# ./clock_test_coarse
218550.844862154
218550.844862154
218550.844862154
218550.845862154
218550.845862154
_COARSE clocks have a one millisecond precision, therefore only the first three digits of the tv_nsec field of the timespec structure are significant. The result above could be read as:
~]# ./clock_test_coarse
218550.844
218550.844
218550.844
218550.845
218550.845
_COARSE variants of the POSIX clocks are particularly useful in cases where timestamping can be performed with millisecond precision. The benefits are more evident on systems which use hardware clocks with high costs for the reading operations, such as ACPI_PM.
15.2.4. Using the time Command to Compare Cost of Reading Clocks
time command to read the clock source 10 million times in a row, you can compare the costs of reading CLOCK_MONOTONIC and CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE representations of the hardware clocks available. The following example uses TSC, HPET and ACPI_PM hardware clocks. For more information on how to decipher the output of the time command see Section 15.1.1, “Reading Hardware Clock Sources”.
Example 15.5. Comparing the Cost of Reading POSIX Clocks
TSC: ~]#time ./clock_timing_monotonicreal 0m0.567s user 0m0.559s sys 0m0.002s ~]#time ./clock_timing_monotonic_coarsereal 0m0.120s user 0m0.118s sys 0m0.001s HPET: ~]#time ./clock_timing_monotonicreal 0m12.257s user 0m12.179s sys 0m0.002s ~]#time ./clock_timing_monotonic_coarsereal 0m0.119s user 0m0.118s sys 0m0.000s ACPI_PM: ~]#time ./clock_timing_monotonicreal 0m25.524s user 0m0.451s sys 0m24.932s ~]#time ./clock_timing_monotonic_coarsereal 0m0.119s user 0m0.117s sys 0m0.001s
sys time (the time spent by the kernel to perform tasks required by the user process) is greatly reduced when the _COARSE clocks are used. This is particularly evident in the ACPI_PM clock timings, which indicates that _COARSE variants of POSIX clocks yield high performance gains on clocks with high reading costs.

Where did the comment section go?
Red Hat's documentation publication system recently went through an upgrade to enable speedier, more mobile-friendly content. We decided to re-evaluate our commenting platform to ensure that it meets your expectations and serves as an optimal feedback mechanism. During this redesign, we invite your input on providing feedback on Red Hat documentation via the discussion platform.