Show Table of Contents
Chapter 59. Security
OpenSCAP rpmverifypackage does not work correctly
The
chdir and chroot system calls are called twice by the rpmverifypackage probe. Consequently, an error occurs when the probe is utilized during an OpenSCAP scan with custom Open Vulnerability and Assessment Language (OVAL) content.
To work around this problem, do not use the
rpmverifypackage_test OVAL test in your content or use only the content from the scap-security-guide package where rpmverifypackage_test is not used. (BZ#1603347)
dconf databases are not checked by OVAL
OVAL (Open Vulnerability and Assessment Language) checks used in the
SCAP Security Guide project are not able to read a dconf binary database, only files used to generate the database. The database is not regenerated automatically, the administrator needs to enter the dconf update command. As a consequence, changes to the database that are not reflected in files in the /etc/dconf/db/ directory cannot be a part of scanning. This might result in false negatives.
To work around this problem, run
dconf update periodically, for example, using the /etc/crontab configuration file. (BZ#1631378)
SCAP Workbench fails to generate results-based remediations from tailored profiles
The following error occurs when trying to generate results-based remediation roles from a customized profile using the the
SCAP Workbench tool:
Error generating remediation role '.../remediation.sh': Exit code of 'oscap' was 1: [output truncated]
OpenSCAP scanner results contain a lot of SELinux context error messages
The
OpenSCAP scanner logs inability to get SELinux context on the ERROR level even in situations where it is not a true error. As a result, OpenSCAP scanner results contain a lot of SELinux context error messages. Both the oscap command-line utility and the SCAP Workbench graphical utility outputs can be hard to read for that reason. (BZ#1640522)

Where did the comment section go?
Red Hat's documentation publication system recently went through an upgrade to enable speedier, more mobile-friendly content. We decided to re-evaluate our commenting platform to ensure that it meets your expectations and serves as an optimal feedback mechanism. During this redesign, we invite your input on providing feedback on Red Hat documentation via the discussion platform.