Chapter 3. Monitor Configuration Reference

The cluster map is a composite of maps, including the monitor map, the OSD map, and the placement group map. The cluster map tracks a number of important events:

When there is a significant change in the state of the cluster for example, a Ceph OSD goes down, a placement group falls into a degraded state, and so on, the cluster map gets updated to reflect the current state of the cluster. Additionally, the Ceph monitor also maintains a history of the prior states of the cluster. The monitor map, OSD map, and placement group map each maintain a history of their map versions. Each version is called an epoch.

When operating the Red Hat Ceph Storage cluster, keeping track of these states is an important part of the cluster administration.

A cluster will run sufficiently with a single monitor. However, a single monitor is a single-point-of-failure. To ensure high availability in a production Ceph storage cluster, run Ceph with multiple monitors so that the failure of a single monitor will not cause a failure of the entire cluster.

When a Ceph storage cluster runs multiple Ceph monitors for high availability, Ceph monitors use the Paxos algorithm to establish consensus about the master cluster map. A consensus requires a majority of monitors running to establish a quorum for consensus about the cluster map (for example, 1; 2 out of 3; 3 out of 5; 4 out of 6; and so on).

mon_force_quorum_join

When you add monitor settings to the Ceph configuration file, you need to be aware of some of the architectural aspects of Ceph monitors. Ceph imposes strict consistency requirements for a Ceph monitor when discovering another Ceph monitor within the cluster. Whereas, Ceph clients and other Ceph daemons use the Ceph configuration file to discover monitors, monitors discover each other using the monitor map (monmap), not the Ceph configuration file.

A Ceph monitor always refers to the local copy of the monitor map when discovering other Ceph monitors in the Red Hat Ceph Storage cluster. Using the monitor map instead of the Ceph configuration file avoids errors that could break the cluster, for example, typos in the Ceph configuration file when specifying a monitor address or port). Since monitors use monitor maps for discovery and they share monitor maps with clients and other Ceph daemons, the monitor map provides monitors with a strict guarantee that their consensus is valid.

Strict consistency also applies to updates to the monitor map. As with any other updates on the Ceph monitor, changes to the monitor map always run through a distributed consensus algorithm called Paxos. The Ceph monitors must agree on each update to the monitor map, such as adding or removing a Ceph monitor, to ensure that each monitor in the quorum has the same version of the monitor map. Updates to the monitor map are incremental so that Ceph monitors have the latest agreed upon version, and a set of previous versions. Maintaining a history enables a Ceph monitor that has an older version of the monitor map to catch up with the current state of the Red Hat Ceph Storage cluster.

If Ceph monitors discovered each other through the Ceph configuration file instead of through the monitor map, it would introduce additional risks because the Ceph configuration files are not updated and distributed automatically. Ceph monitors might inadvertently use an older Ceph configuration file, fail to recognize a Ceph monitor, fall out of a quorum, or develop a situation where Paxos is not able to determine the current state of the system accurately.

In most configuration and deployment cases, tools that deploy Ceph might help bootstrap the Ceph monitors by generating a monitor map for you, for example, Red Hat Storage Console or Ansible. A Ceph monitor requires a few explicit settings:

The bare minimum monitor settings for a Ceph monitor in the Ceph configuration file includes a host name for each monitor if it is not configured for DNS and the monitor address. You can configure these under [mon] or under the entry for a specific monitor.

[mon]
mon_host = hostname1,hostname2,hostname3
mon_addr = 10.0.0.10:6789,10.0.0.11:6789,10.0.0.12:6789

Or

[mon.a]
host = hostname1
mon_addr = 10.0.0.10:6789

As of RHCS 2.4, Ceph does not require the mon_host when the cluster is configured to look up a monitor via the DNS server. To configure the Ceph cluster for DNS lookup, set the mon_dns_srv_name setting in the Ceph configuration file.

Once set, configure the DNS. Create records either IPv4 (A) or IPv6 (AAAA) for the monitors in the DNS zone. For example:

#IPv4
mon1.example.com. A 192.168.0.1
mon2.example.com. A 192.168.0.2
mon3.example.com. A 192.168.0.3

#IPv6
mon1.example.com. AAAA 2001:db8::100
mon2.example.com. AAAA 2001:db8::200
mon3.example.com. AAAA 2001:db8::300

Where: example.com is the DNS search domain.

Then, create the SRV TCP records with the name mon_dns_srv_name configuration setting pointing to the three Monitors. The following example uses the default ceph-mon value.

_ceph-mon._tcp.example.com. 60 IN SRV 10 60 6789 mon1.example.com.
_ceph-mon._tcp.example.com. 60 IN SRV 10 60 6789 mon2.example.com.
_ceph-mon._tcp.example.com. 60 IN SRV 10 60 6789 mon3.example.com.

Monitors run on port 6789 by default, and their priority and weight are all set to 10 and 60 respectively in the foregoing example.

Each Red Hat Ceph Storage cluster has a unique identifier (fsid). If specified, it usually appears under the [global] section of the configuration file. Deployment tools usually generate the fsid and store it in the monitor map, so the value may not appear in a configuration file. The fsid makes it possible to run daemons for multiple clusters on the same hardware.

Red Hat recommends running a production Red Hat Ceph Storage cluster with at least three Ceph monitors to ensure high availability. When you run multiple monitors, you can specify the initial monitors that must be members of the cluster in order to establish a quorum. This may reduce the time it takes for the cluster to come online.

[mon]
mon_initial_members = a,b,c

Ceph provides a default path where Ceph monitors store data. For optimal performance in a production Red Hat Ceph Storage cluster, Red Hat recommends running Ceph monitors on separate hosts and drives from Ceph OSDs. Ceph monitors call the fsync() function often, which can interfere with Ceph OSD workloads.

Ceph monitors store their data as key-value pairs. Using a data store prevents recovering Ceph monitors from running corrupted versions through Paxos, and it enables multiple modification operations in one single atomic batch, among other advantages.

When a Red Hat Ceph Storage cluster gets close to its maximum capacity (specifies by the mon_osd_full_ratio parameter), Ceph prevents you from writing to or reading from Ceph OSDs as a safety measure to prevent data loss. Therefore, letting a production Red Hat Ceph Storage cluster approach its full ratio is not a good practice, because it sacrifices high availability. The default full ratio is .95, or 95% of capacity. This a very aggressive setting for a test cluster with a small number of OSDs.

A common scenario for test clusters involves a system administrator removing a Ceph OSD from the Red Hat Ceph Storage cluster to watch the cluster re-balance. Then, removing another Ceph OSD, and so on until the Red Hat Ceph Storage cluster eventually reaches the full ratio and locks up.

Red Hat recommends a bit of capacity planning even with a test cluster. Planning enables you to gauge how much spare capacity you will need in order to maintain high availability. Ideally, you want to plan for a series of Ceph OSD failures where the cluster can recover to an active + clean state without replacing those Ceph OSDs immediately. You can run a cluster in an active + degraded state, but this is not ideal for normal operating conditions.

The following diagram depicts a simplistic Red Hat Ceph Storage cluster containing 33 Ceph Nodes with one Ceph OSD per host, each Ceph OSD Daemon reading from and writing to a 3TB drive. So this exemplary Red Hat Ceph Storage cluster has a maximum actual capacity of 99TB. With a mon osd full ratio of 0.95, if the Red Hat Ceph Storage cluster falls to 5 TB of remaining capacity, the cluster will not allow Ceph clients to read and write data. So the Red Hat Ceph Storage cluster’s operating capacity is 95 TB, not 99 TB.

It is normal in such a cluster for one or two OSDs to fail. A less frequent but reasonable scenario involves a rack’s router or power supply failing, which brings down multiple OSDs simultaneously (for example, OSDs 7-12). In such a scenario, you should still strive for a cluster that can remain operational and achieve an active + clean state, even if that means adding a few hosts with additional OSDs in short order. If your capacity utilization is too high, you might not lose data, but you could still sacrifice data availability while resolving an outage within a failure domain if capacity utilization of the cluster exceeds the full ratio. For this reason, Red Hat recommends at least some rough capacity planning.

Identify two numbers for your cluster:

To determine the mean average capacity of an OSD within a cluster, divide the total capacity of the cluster by the number of OSDs in the cluster. Consider multiplying that number by the number of OSDs you expect to fail simultaneously during normal operations (a relatively small number). Finally, multiply the capacity of the cluster by the full ratio to arrive at a maximum operating capacity. Then, subtract the number of amount of data from the OSDs you expect to fail to arrive at a reasonable full ratio. Repeat the foregoing process with a higher number of OSD failures (for example, a rack of OSDs) to arrive at a reasonable number for a near full ratio.

[global]
...
mon_osd_full_ratio = .80
mon_osd_nearfull_ratio = .70

Ceph monitors know about the cluster by requiring reports from each OSD, and by receiving reports from OSDs about the status of their neighboring OSDs. Ceph provides reasonable default settings for interaction between monitor and OSD, however, you can modify them as needed.

When you run a production cluster with multiple monitors which is recommended, each monitor checks to see if a neighboring monitor has a more recent version of the cluster map. For example, a map in a neighboring monitor with one or more epoch numbers higher than the most current epoch in the map of the instant monitor. Periodically, one monitor in the cluster might fall behind the other monitors to the point where it must leave the quorum, synchronize to retrieve the most current information about the cluster, and then rejoin the quorum. For the purposes of synchronization, monitors can assume one of three roles:

These roles enable a leader to delegate synchronization duties to a provider, which prevents synchronization requests from overloading the leader and improving performance. In the following diagram, the requester has learned that it has fallen behind the other monitors. The requester asks the leader to synchronize, and the leader tells the requester to synchronize with a provider.

Synchronization always occurs when a new monitor joins the cluster. During runtime operations, monitors can receive updates to the cluster map at different times. This means the leader and provider roles may migrate from one monitor to another. If this happens while synchronizing (for example, a provider falls behind the leader), the provider can terminate synchronization with a requester.

Once synchronization is complete, Ceph requires trimming across the cluster. Trimming requires that the placement groups are active + clean.

Ceph daemons pass critical messages to each other, which must be processed before daemons reach a timeout threshold. If the clocks in Ceph monitors are not synchronized, it can lead to a number of anomalies. For example:

See Monitor Store Synchronization for details.

Clock drift may still be noticeable with NTP even though the discrepancy is not yet harmful. Ceph clock drift and clock skew warnings can get triggered even though NTP maintains a reasonable level of synchronization. Increasing your clock drift may be tolerable under such circumstances. However, a number of factors such as workload, network latency, configuring overrides to default timeouts and the Monitor Store Synchronization settings may influence the level of acceptable clock drift without compromising Paxos guarantees.

Ceph provides the following tunable options to allow you to find acceptable values.