Show Table of Contents
10.6. RPC/Literal
With RPC there is a wrapper element that names the endpoint operation. Child elements of the RPC parent are the individual parameters. The SOAP body is constructed based on some simple rules:
RPC is defined by the style attribute on the SOAP binding.
- The port type operation name defines the endpoint method name
- Message parts are endpoint method parameters
<binding name='EndpointInterfaceBinding' type='tns:EndpointInterface'>
<soap:binding style='rpc' transport='http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http'/>
<operation name='echo'>
<soap:operation soapAction=''/>
<input>
<soap:body namespace='http://org.jboss.ws/samples/jsr181pojo' use='literal'/>
</input>
<output>
<soap:body namespace='http://org.jboss.ws/samples/jsr181pojo' use='literal'/>
</output>
</operation>
</binding>
With RPC style web services the portType names the operation (i.e. the java method on the endpoint)
<portType name='EndpointInterface'>
<operation name='echo' parameterOrder='String_1'>
<input message='tns:EndpointInterface_echo'/>
<output message='tns:EndpointInterface_echoResponse'/>
</operation>
</portType>
Operation parameters are defined by individual message parts.
<message name='EndpointInterface_echo'> <part name='String_1' type='xsd:string'/> </message> <message name='EndpointInterface_echoResponse'> <part name='result' type='xsd:string'/> </message>
Note
There is no complex type in XML schema that could validate the entire SOAP message payload.
@WebService
@SOAPBinding(style = SOAPBinding.Style.RPC)
public class JSEBean01
{
@WebMethod
@WebResult(name="result")
public String echo(@WebParam(name="String_1") String input)
{
...
}
}
The element names of RPC parameters/return values may be defined using the JAX-WS Annotations#javax.jws.WebParam and JAX-WS Annotations#javax.jws.WebResult respectively.

Where did the comment section go?
Red Hat's documentation publication system recently went through an upgrade to enable speedier, more mobile-friendly content. We decided to re-evaluate our commenting platform to ensure that it meets your expectations and serves as an optimal feedback mechanism. During this redesign, we invite your input on providing feedback on Red Hat documentation via the discussion platform.