Unable to install redhat 6.4 using kickstart on x3690 server

Latest response

Hi,

I am trying to install redhat linux server 6.4 on x3690 X5 server. When i insert the rhel 6.4 iso I get the gnu grub menu, I don't get the option to hit the tab key to get to the boot prompt where I can insert my kickstart command.
The grub menu comes up with 3 options

  1. red hat enterprise linux 6.4
  2. install system with basic video driver
  3. rescue

"use the up arrow and down arrow keys to select which entry is highlighted. Press enter to boot the selected OS, 'e' to edit the commands before booting, 'a' to modify the kernel arguments before booting, or 'c' for command-line"

At this point when I press the 'tab' key I don't get the boot option where I can put my kickstart http details.
When I press the 'e' key I get further 2 options:

kernel /images/pxeboot/vmlinuz
initrd /images/pxeboot/initrd.img

I change the initrd to initrd /images/pxeboot/initrdtest and then boot, the server then boots from the DVD. Which then allows me to do a fresh install of Linux. I don't get the option to put my http kickstart details.

Any ideas?

Ketan

Responses

updated
Hi Ketan,
Did that earlier procedure from that Red Hat solution not work? See the post just above...

Kind Regards,
Remmele

Hi Remmele,

If I select Legacy Option is there any limitation on the hardware/memory?
What is the difference between leagcy option and UEFI?

Ketan

Hi Ketan,

Sorry I do not know. The IBM article (and the Red Hat solution) seems to allow the install via non-UEFI but doesn't go into detail. You might have to research that at the IBM website, and this link seems to have IBM documentation for your specific server

The difference with the legacy option and UEFI from the IBM article seems to be whether or not it uses UEFI or goes to the BIOS type of boot. Here is more background on UEFI from wikipedia.

I do not have any UEFI servers (today), but have seen it at other locations I occasionally go to.

From the IBM and Red Hat articles, it seems to give a work-around to load the system with non-UEFI.

Sorry, I may not be available here much today (by the way, the help in this discussion area is voluntary).

Kind Regards,
Remmele

Ketan, I have a few dell servers using BIOS (and not UEFI) that have .5TB of RAM running fine. This wikipedia article has more general background on UEFI. If you can use UEFI (as James mentioned) please do so!

Hi Ketan,

I do not believe so. I have several Dell servers running .5TB RAM with no issues running with non-UEFI. UEFI is a bit of a new technology that IBM embraced perhaps more readily than other vendors. Check out the wikipedia on UEFI for more background.

Hi "unix support" - I'm not exactly sure where you are at in the troubleshooting process (hard to see which posts were last when they are replies ;-)

If I was in this particular situation (and I have been) - I would do a basic system installation from DVD (no kickstart), identify your drives/partitions/volumes... and then once you have finished the install, you will have a /root/anaconda-ks.cfg that you can retrieve the drive information from.

One of the threads in here reminded me of another situation I found myself in with the IBM server - I had installed RHEV, then VMware ESXi ... and somewhere along the way I could no longer boot the system and could not put an OS on the drives. I don't exactly know what the issue was, but I resolved it by booting with a Knoppix CD and wiping the drive information and then re-installing a GPT disk label.

My opinion is that UEFI is the better option, IF... you can make it work (obviously). Like I mentioned earlier - I suspect you are having issues with Legacy vs UEFI boot, GPT vs MSDOS boot label, or the quirky issue with the MBR I just mentioned.

Good luck!

IBM is typically very good at identifying oddities with their systems, and I don't really see any mention of strange configurations options, etc... for the install.
http://www-947.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/docdisplay?lndocid=MIGR-5087593

Ketan,

I can tell you this regarding RAM and a few of the servers I have...

I have a few Dell servers with .5TB RAM running RHEL 6.5 and --not-- using UEFI.

Kind Regards,
Remmele

Ketan,
I agree with James - if you CAN get UEFI to work, use it!!!

It just seemed from that Red Hat article it recommended not using it. That --does not-- mean it won't work, you just might have to do a "Louis and Clark" expedition to make it work.

Hi Remmele,

I tried booting from legacy option only and when I came to adding my boot details all the keystrokes where coming up twice (tteesstt) then the machine froze.

I think I will now try adding the following:

zerombr
ignoredisk --only-use=sda
part /boot/efi --fstype="vfat" --size=100 -ondisk=sda

Is this the correct parameters.

updated
Hi Ketan,

I remembered posting this from yesterday. This is from centos - but no one ever replied it it worked or not. This is worth a try to make UEFI work - centos.org forum UEFI boot partition line for kickstart, especially the portion where you see what is in the code block below...

Try this (and use UEFI, not the legacy bit) in your kickstart file... not sure if it will work (the centos forum link above never had an update if that worked, it is worth a shot)

part /boot/efi --fstype="EFI System Partition" --size=500 --ondisk=sda

See what James wrote above (thanks James)

I'll be tied up the rest of the day most likely.

Kind Regards,
Remmele

update - I thought another person (James) had posted here - if you --can-- get UEFI to work, it would be better (he mentioned that and I agree). I saw this morning at IBM's website that they believed UEFI support for RHEL 6 was resolved at RHEL 6.2 and you're using RHEL 6.4.

I do have a few dell servers running RHEL 6.5 with .5TB of RAM not using UEFI working fine, but if you can get UEFI to work, awesome.

Apologies for the clutter of links within the replies, there are some links I gave going to IBM's website and they have generally some very good documentation. One of the links I provided is specific to your server (today).

Try that bit in this post for your kickstart file, hope it works.

kind Regards,
Remmele

Thanks, I will try this and let you know.

Hi Ketan, it seems my replies may not be populating here.

My replies have not been populating here...

Try this in the kickstart file, booting --with UEFI-- enabled!

part /boot/efi --fstype="EFI System Partition" --size=500 --ondisk=sda

I found this on a centos forum (posted it earlier in this discussion). If you can use EUFI, do so.

My replies have not been populating here...

Try this in the kickstart file, booting --with UEFI-- enabled!

part /boot/efi --fstype="EFI System Partition" --size=500 --ondisk=sda

I found this on a centos forum (posted it earlier in this discussion). If you can use EUFI, do so.

Hi Ketan,

I'm typing this with apparently a broken browser - regarding your question about being able to boot to the dvd, are you able to put in a "linux ks=http://...." (I mentioned an example kickstart boot example earlier) with the proper path to your kickstart file?

I remember your drive had what seemed to be a partial load, and would go to grub when you tried this. When I faced this issue (mentioned earlier in this dicusssion), I would use the raid utility to format the sda drive then re-try the kickstart, and in my environment, that would resolve things.

the clearpart should be constrained to your /dev/sda unless the attached raid arrays can be wiped without issue.

Did you try that one addition to your kickstart file mentioned earlier (I can not see if it made it into the discussion, something is odd with this system I'm currently using).

Hi Ketan,

Not sure if my posts will make it here in this discussion

Try entering the following into your kickstart file. I found this in a centos.org forum (mentioned earlier in this discussion).

  • Use UEFI with this bit below, not the legacy boot!
part /boot/efi --fstype="EFI System Partition" --size=500 --ondisk=sda
  • I mentioned earlier in this discussion regarding the problem when you enter a kickstart you land in grub... format the disk (if needed with a raid bios utility or using anaconda).
  • **It seems until the disk is reformatted, the kickstart will land in grub (i've seen this before, mentioned previously a possible resolution). (mentioned previously on 6 May)

  • Use 'zerombr' in the kickstart file and use the clearpart directive (constrain to your sda drive unless all raid arrays can be wiped). clearpart --ondrive=sda (mentioned previously on 6 May)

I hope this post makes it into the discussion, been trying to fix my own computer here where I am currently at.

Apologies for the repetitive posts earlier. Apparently the browser I was using earlier was not displaying most of today's posts.

Ketan, a recap

It seems this is the situation you have...

Based on the context of all we've discussed here's what I suspect you likely have to do next

1) Before anything else, first of all - Format the drive that is your /dev/sda drive either with a raid bios function (your IBM server may have some nice tool built in for this as well), or using anaconda to format your drive that is /dev/sda. IMPACT: Until this is done, it seems any attempt to kickstart will land you into grub (I've seen this in my environment a few times and formatting the drive seems to fix the issue.

2) After formatting the /dev/sda drive above, -- Yes, use vfat in the kickstart (2 sources)
a. REFERENCE this link, and also
b. and this link.

Verify & place this bit below into your kickstart (note, The --initlabel option has been deprecated.)

zerombr
ignoredisk --only-use=sda
bootloader --location=mbr
clearpart --all --drives=sda 
part /boot/efi --asprimary --fstype=vfat --size=500 --label=EFI --ondisk=sda
[remainder of partitioning goes here in subsequent lines]

NOTE: I've found differing documentation regarding vfat and ext3 on RHEL 6 with the /boot/efi partition. this source, paragraph 9.15.5.1.1. Advice on Partitions says " UEFI systems should contain a 50-150MB /boot/efi partition with an EFI System Partition filesystem" (I would never make a /boot partition less than 500MB myself)

3) AFTER editing the kickstart, Try the kickstart using UEFI --not the legacy boot--
- James is correct, and the non-UEFI method would be better, and only use the non-UEFI method if it simply is impossible. I saw that Red Hat article posted earlier on this, however that doesn't mean UEFI will not work necessarily.

  • If vfat does not work, try this instead in the kickstart file:
part /boot/efi --asprimary --fstype="EFI System Partition" --size=500 --label=boot --ondisk=sda

4) If UEFI will not work, reengage here and someone here hopefully can help, or perhaps try what was listed in that Red Hat Solution that said to use the Legacy method for your server.

Hope this helps, sorry for the scattered posts and repetitive posts (my browser on my other computer is broken, will dump it).

Kind Regards,
Remmele

Ketan, I can not edit the last post, this discussion is so long I believe it is causing issues with "edit" here in this specific discussion.

In the line above in my post where it says:
"clearpart --all --drives=sda "
---> instead use:
"clearpart --drives=sda "

Hi Remmele,

I did the following, I added an additional (boot/efi) entry just after my /boot in my kickstart file:

part /boot --fstype ext4 --size=500 --ondisk=sda
part /boot/efi --fstype="EFI System Partition" --size=500 --ondisk=sda

Is this the correct way.

Ketan

The server has installed but now I can see 2 boot partitions:

Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/rootvg-rootlv
1008M 251M 707M 27% /
tmpfs 95G 0 95G 0% /dev/shm
/dev/sda2 485M 38M 422M 9% /boot
/dev/sda1 500M 272K 500M 1% /boot/efi

Hi Ketan,

Very glad the server is installed... That looks like a rather small drive.

In your kickstart file, were there two lines for /boot (one for /boot and the other for /boot/efi)? That could be why you have multiple partitions.

How big is the /sda drive (total, before all formatting)? Did any other partitions get created as you wish or do you only have those partitions above? That's a small drive. Is the drive you loaded this on really only about 2GB total?

What is the output of these commands:
df -PhT /boot/efi
and
fdisk -l

Gotta run to an appointment,

Kind Regards,
Remmele

df -PhT /boot/efi

Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 vfat 500M 272K 500M 1% /boot/efi

df -PhT /boot

Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda2 ext4 485M 38M 422M 9% /boot

fdisk -l

WARNING: GPT (GUID Partition Table) detected on '/dev/sdb'! The util fdisk doesn't support GPT. Use GNU Parted.

Disk /dev/sdb: 146.0 GB, 145999527936 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 17750 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000

Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 1 17751 142577663+ ee GPT

WARNING: GPT (GUID Partition Table) detected on '/dev/sda'! The util fdisk doesn't support GPT. Use GNU Parted.

Disk /dev/sda: 146.0 GB, 145999527936 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 17750 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000

Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 1 17751 142577663+ ee GPT

In my kickstart file I added the /boot/efi just under the /boot.

bootloader --location=mbr --driveorder=sda,sdb --append="crashkernel=auto rhgb quiet"
clearpart --all --initlabel --drives=sda
part /boot --fstype ext4 --size=500 --ondisk=sda
part /boot/efi --fstype="EFI System Partition" --size=500 --ondisk=sda
part pv.13 --size=1 --grow --ondisk=sda
volgroup rootvg --pesize=32768 pv.13
logvol swap --fstype swap --name=swaplv --vgname=rootvg --size=4096
logvol / --fstype ext4 --name=rootlv --vgname=rootvg --size=1024
logvol /home --fstype ext4 --name=homelv --vgname=rootvg --size=1024
logvol /tmp --fstype ext4 --name=tmplv --vgname=rootvg --size=2976
logvol /usr --fstype ext4 --name=usrlv --vgname=rootvg --size=2976
logvol /var --fstype ext4 --name=varlv --vgname=rootvg --size=992
logvol /usr/local --fstype ext4 --name=usrlocallv --vgname=rootvg --size=992
logvol /opt --fstype ext4 --name=optlv --vgname=rootvg --size=1984
logvol /xymon --fstype ext4 --name=xymonlv --vgname=rootvg --size=512
logvol /tran --fstype ext4 --name=tranlv --vgname=rootvg --size=1024
logvol /logs --fstype ext4 --name=logslv --vgname=rootvg --size=256
logvol /nmon --fstype ext4 --name=nmonlv --vgname=rootvg --size=256
logvol /perf --fstype ext4 --name=perflv --vgname=rootvg --size=512

It looks like there is 2 boot partitions, the disks are 146GB.

Ketan, along with the above commands in the last post I made, run
df -PhT
as well - thanks

df -PhT

Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/rootvg-rootlv ext4 1008M 251M 707M 27% /
tmpfs tmpfs 95G 0 95G 0% /dev/shm
/dev/sda2 ext4 485M 38M 422M 9% /boot
/dev/sda1 vfat 500M 272K 500M 1% /boot/efi
/dev/mapper/rootvg-logslv ext4 248M 11M 226M 5% /logs
/dev/mapper/rootvg-tranlv ext4 1008M 34M 924M 4% /tran
/dev/mapper/rootvg-homelv ext4 1008M 34M 923M 4% /home
/dev/mapper/rootvg-nmonlv ext4 248M 11M 225M 5% /nmon
/dev/mapper/rootvg-optlv ext4 2.0G 35M 1.8G 2% /opt
/dev/mapper/rootvg-perflv ext4 504M 29M 450M 7% /perf
/dev/mapper/rootvg-tmplv ext4 2.9G 69M 2.7G 3% /tmp
/dev/mapper/rootvg-usrlv ext4 2.9G 1.5G 1.3G 53% /usr
/dev/mapper/rootvg-usrlocallv ext4 977M 18M 910M 2% /usr/local
/dev/mapper/rootvg-varlv ext4 977M 70M 858M 8% /var
/dev/mapper/rootvg-xymonlv ext4 504M 20M 459M 5% /xymon

Ketan,

The '/' partition is terribly small - it looks like it is 1GB.

Sorry - perhaps should have specified, when you used the /boot/efi - I believe you did not need the additional partition of /boot/ I think in the example I gave, it only had /boot/efi

Also, your LVM volumes do not total out to the entirety of your 146GB drive. I'd recommend a --grow with your "/" partition, and larger sizes for the remainder for your partitons.

Ketan, it looks like your entire drive /dev/sda is not fully used.
I noticed a GPT partition.

I'm late for an appointment that will take most of the morning - and will be tied up this afternoon.

It seems your partitions are not very generous (understatement TM) for a 146GB drive.

Did you get this partitioning as a mandate from some vendor or someone? I'd recommend a more generous partitioning scheme where the full use of your 146gb drive is taken.

The /boot and /boot/efi also seems like overkill.

Sorry I have to go to my appointment

Kind Regards,
Remmele

Can I re-run the kickstart install again, change my kickstart config and remove /boot can I make /boot/efi as ext4 partition type. We will be using some of the space on disk for user installs like applications. Must say am not really sure about GPT partition, we use Linux partition.

Hi Ketan,

  • I noticed the GPT partition and it seems to be preventing you from using the entire disk. See next bit in the next line...
    • I believe this Red Hat Solution will help you remove the GPT partition from your sda drive (look at the output you provided above). If you want to remove the GPT partition on your /dev/sdb drive, that procedure should help as well.

NOTE: I'd recommend doing the above first before re-kickstarting your system...

Next...

  • I greatly suspect that the /boot/efi partition you have with 'vfat' seems to have taken the needed EFI partition, in which case you would not need to define a extra /boot partition. I believe you just need to remove the /boot line from your kickstart and use the one (you used before) for /boot/efi.

  • NOTE: the "--initlabel" bit is deprecated (mentioned May 9th, see previous posts), however it seemed to get you initially going.

quote from above link:

The --initlabel option has been deprecated. To 
initialize disks with invalid partition tables 
and clear their contents, use the zerombr command. 

A few questions...

  • Do you have any other systems such as this one you could look at the partitioning to see if the partitioning is sufficient?

    • If you do have another like system, have you had any of those partitions fill up?
  • I have no idea what role/service(s) your server will fulfill. It seems the partitions are terribly small especially since you would want to use the entire 146GB drive, and right now the GPT partition seems to be preventing you from doing so (see first paragraph).

  • I would highly recommend:
    1) Reviewing the role of your server and defining something larger for your partitions (especially "/", "/tmp", "/usr", "/var" and maybe "/home". If needed, confer with your co-workers or whoever is asking for you to create the server.

    • I noticed you have a "/logs" directory, do you have a requirement to put some atypical logs under "/logs"?
    • The typical location for logs is "/var/log" and I typically make my logs go there.
    • Did you have some requirement for a "/logs" directory?
    • Is there a reason you could not use "/var/log" instead of "/logs"? This is your choice, but just something to consider.
  • The remaining directories you have defined, I can not tell you if they are sufficient but recommend you research so that later the system doesn't have full partitions and crash.

  • Again, I'd highly recommend reviewing your system for the partitions you have to see how you can use the entire 146GB after removing that GPT partition.

This next line in your kickstart would make your bootloader go on sda (and sdb would be not considered for the bootloader)

bootloader --location=mbr --driveorder=sda --append="crashkernel=auto rhgb quiet"
  • This would clear the partitions, and if you wished, you could replace the "bootloader" below with the one just above.

clearpart --drives=sda,sdb --all zerombr bootloader --location=mbr clearpart --all --drives=sda part /boot/efi --asprimary --fstype=vfat --size=500 --label=EFI --ondisk=sda part pv.13 --size=1 --grow --ondisk=sda volgroup rootvg --pesize=32768 pv.13 [remainder of partitioning you define goes here in subsequent lines]

Ketan, Remember to clear the GPT partition on at least your sda drive (see first lines in this post).

Kind Regards,
Remmele

Hi Remmele,

The filesystems created from our kickstart image is standard across all installs, all the RHEL OS are installed on VM's this is the first time am install RHEL on a standalone machine, we haven't had to change the /boot to /boot/efi on other systems, if I look at some of the VM's the /boot is setup as ext4 or ext3. This is the first time I've come across where I have had to change the /boot to /boot/efi, am not aware of the GPT partition. Can the boot/efi fstype be ext4.

Hi Ketan,

Understood... Do you typically use vmware?

I brought up the removal of the GPT partition because you have a 146GB drive and it seems from all your output you certainly not using all of it. I recognize now that your partitioning is a reflection of what you use in your virtual world. If you DO wish to use the entire 146GB drive, you'll still need to remove that GPT partition.

I think your IBM physical system is what caused the need for the /boot/efi partition.

  • I believe you need to keep the /boot/efi partition to what you used very recently when the kickstart finally worked. I just think it is overkill to have both /boot and /boot/efi in your kickstart file when /boot/efi seems to be what you needed.
    • (see previous comments and sources I provided leading to various links for references).

As far as the other systems, if they are operational/running, they probably should be left alone.

Does that small amount of partitioning provide enough space on your systems in general so that your partitions do not fill up? Generally, it is bad when a partition fills up and can cause issues based on whatever partition actually fills up.

See the previous posts, and especially the references/links regarding the /boot/efi partition.

Kind Regards,
Remmele

Hi Remmele,
Is it best practise for me to start all over again and remove the /boot entry in our kickstart? Sorry about this, but am trying to get my standalone system exactly the same as my other systems. Am not sure how its put GPT partition?
Ketan

All,

I have been following this discussion and see that you come to a point where I think I have to add my point of view.

/boot
and
/boot/efi

are both needed on server that supports EFI.

/boot can be ext2, ext3 or ext4 (perferred ext4) on RHEL 6.4+

/boot/efi needs to be vfat.

Sorry Ketan, I do not see a way to keep this VMware compatible. Maybe Red Hat support knows a way to avoid EFI compatiblity.

Kind regards,

Jan Gerrit Kootstra

Thats ok but why is my partition showing on my newly build server as GPT, on all of my other servers the partition is showing as:

fdisk -l

Disk /dev/sda: 145.9 GB, 145999527936 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 17750 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 1 13 104391 83 Linux
/dev/sda2 14 17750 142472452+ 8e Linux LVM

These are all on VM's

This is the first time i've installed RHEL 6.4 on a standalone server and the partition table is showing as:

fdisk -l

WARNING: GPT (GUID Partition Table) detected on '/dev/sdb'! The util fdisk doesn't support GPT. Use GNU Parted.

Disk /dev/sdb: 146.0 GB, 145999527936 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 17750 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000

Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 1 17751 142577663+ ee GPT

WARNING: GPT (GUID Partition Table) detected on '/dev/sda'! The util fdisk doesn't support GPT. Use GNU Parted.

Disk /dev/sda: 146.0 GB, 145999527936 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 17750 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000

Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 1 17751 142577663+ ee GPT

Hi Ketan,

I can't answer that last question, I suspect the gpt partition may have preceded the fun/events we have entertained maybe. In any case, the procedure I posted yesterday would eliminate the GPT partition.

I'll be unavailable today, tied up.

Kind Regards,
Remmele

Hi Ketan,

I do not have a lot of experience with UEFI, none of my systems run it. However, it's supposed to be a possible or maybe likely replacement for bios and the limitations of bios. See this article by PC world

I believe we covered some (maybe not all) of that previously. I have several Dell servers running BIOS and not UEFI with .5TB RAM/memory with no issues with RHEL 6.5 server. I posted a wikipedia article previously on UEFI. At the very surface, I believe the difference between the legacy option and UEFI based on the IBM docs (see source posted earlier), is that one is BIOS (legacy) and the other is UEFI. Do some research at IBM's website with links such as below regarding UEFI. It seems to attempt to have some advantages over BIOS.

See this link regarding background information for UEFI by IBM

This link offers an opinion on the advantages of UEFI vs BIOS

Kind Regards,
Remmele

Ketan, please -disregard- the last post (2014-05-13T), I was using my broken browser...

Jan, thank you - I have never used UEFI. However, do you need both partitions in the kickstart?

Thanks,
Rem

Ketan, regarding your question on the gpt label, I have no idea how it got there either. If you wanted to use the remainder of the disk, you could remove it with the parted commands.

Jan, thanks again, see post just above this, thanks.

Kind Regards,
Remmele

Jan (and Ketan)

I believe this Red Hat documentation explains the two partitions that Jan spoke of earlier. So follow Jan's advice above with TWO partitions (see his post.

Thanks for the info,
Remmele

Ketan,

I think Jan is right regarding what he mentioned on calling Red Hat Support regarding what he addressed on EFI compatibility.

Thanks

Man, can't believe I missed that (two partitions), thanks Jan.

Hi Remmele,

Thanks for your help on this, I have one question, how can I setup a printer queue pointing to a remote Jetdirect queue on rhel6.4, I can see alot of notes on using the GUI base printer configurator tools, but I want to set this up via command line.

Thanks

ketan

Hello Ketan - I would recommend starting a new thread for your Printer issues. That way the right people will see the subject and know what the thread is about and will be able to respond.

Take care
/ james

Pages

Close

Welcome! Check out the Getting Started with Red Hat page for quick tours and guides for common tasks.